Search columns
Search news bureau
Search UGA
Sections
Campus News
Around Academe
Worth Repeating
Go Figure
Digest
UGA Guide
Weekly Reader
Cybersights
Bulletin Board
Back Issues


since 12/15/98
Columns::September 3, 2002

Three are named GUC undergraduate program directors
New NSF pilot project will produce ‘gene encyclopedias’
‘Bridges to the Doctorate’ NIH grant will support graduate education of minority students at UGA
Chick-fil-A hold grand opening at Tate Student Center
Mountain ecologist is appointed international education director
The burden of care: Study shows mothers’ depression affects children’s well-being
Managers complete training; Research Fellows announced
Newsmakers
Retirees
Newsmakers
The Honduras Connection


Campus News


Writing wrongs
Civil rights historian pens scholarly account of university’s desegregation

Robert Pratt, associate professor of history, is the author of We Shall Not Be Moved: The Desegregation of the University of
Robert Pratt
Robert Pratt
Georgia, published this summer by the University of Georgia Press. The book focuses on the struggle, which lasted for more than a decade, faced by African Americans who wanted to enroll at UGA. He talked to Columns about the origins of the book and the surprises he encountered while writing it.

Columns: What led you to write this book?

Pratt
: I wrote my first book on school desegregation in Richmond, Va. I came to the University of Georgia with that book nearly completed, and I realized that eventually I’d have to turn to another project. I’d always considered myself a scholar of civil rights history and was aware that there had never been a scholarly study of the desegregation of the University of Georgia. I considered that to be a fairly significant omission. Calvin Trillin’s book, An Education in Georgia, appeared in 1963, but that was a journalistic account. Charlayne Hunter-Gault had written her memoirs, but she only talks about her days at UGA in a couple of chapters. There had just been no scholarly study done.

Columns: What was the most difficult part of piecing together the story of UGA’s integration?

Pratt:
The most difficult part in writing about civil rights history and race relations is trying to get people on the other side to open up and give you information. That was true in this book and that was true in the book I wrote on Richmond--trying to get those white people who are still alive to open up and be honest and candid about what happened about the era in which they lived, how they would explain the positions that they took 35 or 40 years ago. But I understand that such admissions can be painful.

Columns: Are there unsung heroes in this story?

Pratt:
The unsung heroes are probably those African-American students who came in the aftermath of Holmes and Hunter. I interviewed several of those students, people like local attorney Ken Dious. He pointed out to me that it was tough for Holmes and Hunter, because they were the first, but at least they had the cameras here--they had the media attention. And that afforded them some small measure of protection. But those students who came a year or two later, once the cameras had left, caught the full brunt of it without any kind of media attention.

Columns: Were you pleased that the UGA Press published the book?

Pratt:
It was very important to me. As is the case with any scholar, you either want to publish your book with a commercial press and make tons of money, or you want to go with an academic press that has a certain academic clout to it. I had been impressed with the kinds of things the UGA Press had been publishing over the years, so I knew the Press had that cachet, especially in regard to works of Southern history. To me it seemed like a natural.
Early on, I approached then-editor Malcolm Call, and he gave me encouragement and said this is a book that they wanted. I sort of jokingly said it might be too hot for the UGA Press to handle. But he said no--we can handle it. He made it clear from the outset that I was free to write the book that I wanted in the tone that I thought was appropriate.

Columns: Were there surprises in your research?

Pratt:
The thing that surprised me the most was the lengths to which white lawmakers and university administrators went in order to keep the University of Georgia all white. I knew about segregation and about the schemes and ruses that white universities used to keep blacks out. But when I looked through documents, through the regents’ minutes, through the minutes of the state lawmakers, and saw some of the schemes and subterfuges they came up with to keep black students out of this university--it was just incredible. But I shouldn’t have been surprised at all.

Columns: The events outside Charlayne Hunter’s room in Myers Hall in 1961 have sometimes been described as a “spontaneous disturbance” following a tough basketball game with Georgia Tech. You present considerable evidence that it was a planned riot. Do you believe this was covered up or downplayed then or over the years?

Pratt:
I hesitate to say that it was covered up. I do believe it was deliberately downplayed. That’s pretty evident from the existing literature. In the early stuff that was written, there was an attempt to put the best possible spin on the events. Even now, 40 years after the fact, there is a tendency on the part of some to characterize it as a disturbance, when clearly many of those who were there considered it to be much more. It was a nasty riot.

Columns: How far have we come since the integration of UGA? How far do we still have to go?

Pratt:
Those are fair questions but not always ones that are easy to answer. If you look at where we were as a society 40 years ago and compare that to where we are today, you have to conclude that we’ve come a long way. I was the first African American, for example, ever to be hired in the history department [in 1987], and now there are five of us. We have made some progress. But we haven’t been able to climb above 6 percent African-American students here, so we’re having a very difficult challenge. I find that troubling because other universities, such as Ole Miss and Alabama, who had a much more turbulent time in desegregating their universities, have since done much better in recruiting African-American students. The University of Georgia’s lack of black students is clearly troublesome.
I think the reason is that, among other things, university administrators have not been sufficiently aggressive in recruiting. When we reach the point that we recruit black academic stars the same way we recruit black athletic stars, then those numbers will begin to rise.




UGA Today supports QuickTime, Flash, RealPlayer and Acrobat Reader (PDF files).
Download information about these plug-ins.
Affiliate icons for UGA Today

COLUMNS ] UGA Today ] Subscribe ] News Bureau ]
Office of Public Affairs Directory ] Photo Services ]
Broadcast, Video & Photography ] Master Calendar]
Columns ] Georgia Magazine ]Visitors Center ]
UGA Home ] Alumni ] Admissions ] UGA Directories ]
Sports ] Weather ] Search UGA sites ]

Columns is produced by the UGA News Service, a unit of UGA Public Affairs.
Beth Roberts: Columns editor, Juliett Dinkins: Columns managing editor,
Janet Beckley: Columns art director. Peter Frey: Columns photo editor

Questions or comments should be directed to columns@uga.edu


Copyright 2002 University of Georgia. All rights reserved