|
|
 |
 |
 |
Reclassification of job
titles will begin next month |
By Larry B. Dendy
ldendy@uga.edu |
 |
Duane Ritter |
Jody Jacobs’s job in the Environmental Safety Division is managing
a four-person staff charged with ensuring that university researchers
use radioactive materials safely and in compliance with federal regulations.
But you’d never know that from his job title, which is “program
specialist.”
Beginning in February, Jacobs will have a new title that accurately
describes his job: “radiation safety manager.”
“This title reflects my area of expertise and is a lot more
understandable,” says Jacobs, who has worked in environmental
safety since 2002. “Now if somebody wants to know what I do,
they can tell by my title.”
Jacobs is among several thousand staff members who are getting new
job titles as part of an effort by Human Resources to modernize UGA’s
outdated classification and pay system.
A key part of the project is ensuring that titles actually reflect
the work people do.
Human Resources employees have spent more than a year studying job
descriptions and some 700 job titles assigned to nearly 7,000 non-faculty
staff members. They found that many of the titles—most of which
have been in place 25 years or longer—had little relevance
to the actual work performed by people who held them.
They managed to group positions with similar kinds of work into about
30 job “families,” and to create about 500 job
classifications.
“Each classification has a specific description,” says
Duane Ritter, director of employment, compensation and records in
Human Resources, who heads the project. “Those classifications
include job titles, and those titles will now better define the work
people are doing.”
Human Resources will begin rolling out the new titles to groups of
employees in February. Among the first to get title changes are people
who work in food services, information technology, police and the
libraries.
Food services staffers who were called “chief cook” now
are “chefs.” Former “public safety officers”
are now “police officers.”
Ritter says part of the reason the old titles stayed in place so long
is that they were mandated by the board of regents.
Many were created when such positions as “database administrator”
didn’t even exist. The regents have now lifted restrictions
on title changes.
Two titles that will take a big hit are the ubiquitous “program
specialist” and “program coordinator.”
“These were being used in variety of ways with no consistency,”
says Ritter.
Some people will retain these titles but most will get a title that
better describes their job.
Ritter says some titles—such as “bus operator” and
“carpenter”—won’t change because they accurately
reflect the work being done.
And efforts are still under way to refine titles in some broad areas
such as accounting and administrative support.
Ritter hopes most people will be satisfied with their new titles,
but anyone who objects can request a review through Human Resources.
Updated job descriptions and other information about the title changes
will be available at the Web site www.hr.uga.edu.
Except for a few isolated cases, the new titles will have no effect
on salaries, according to Ritter. “Unfortunately, we just don’t
have the budget resources to address salaries and appropriate market
positions,” he says. “We will use the new titling to build
a foundation to address pay issues in the future, but for now most
positions will remain in the same pay grade.”
Now that titles have been updated, Human Resources won’t let
them get out of kilter again, Ritter promises.
“We went from 1978 to now with no changes, but this will now
be an ongoing process and we will make adjustments as needed,”
he says. “You won’t see another 25 years pass before
more changes are made.”
Updating job classifications and titles is a major part of a larger
initiative Human Resources began in 2000 to modernize UGA’s
pay and classification system, which has changed little from the way
it was implemented by the board of regents in the 1970s.
Other issues being addressed include non-competitive pay scales and
ineffective salary administration practices. Ritter says work continues
on these problems. |
| |
|
|