Minutes of the DLS: April 17, 1997

 

Minutes of the Demosthenian Literary Society

April 17, 1997

or, De President Does Demosthenian, Episode 4: A New Hope

INT.-THE PARTY - DAY

Scene 1 – It’s a star-studded, lemon-soaked, X-file-like jamboree at Ms. Tomlinson’s cathouse heretofore referred to as . . . The Shack!  Our Hero, Mr. Choi, steps in sexy slow-motion from the back bedroom with Ms. Polentz (alumna) and Chief Van Meter in tow.  They all wear glowing smiles.

Cue bad 70’s theme music and voice-over

Yeah!  Who's that cat who knows where it’s at, nice and lean like a lovin’ machine, always on the scene, with Listerine and Charlie Sheen and . . . Maybeline?  Mr. Choi!  Can.  You dig it?

 

- Our Hero struts his way to the kitchen, stopping only for a moment where Ms. Shillington, Ms. Richie, and other black men are shooting craps in the corner.  He exchanges SOUL taps with Ms. Richie and goes on.  He was just about to clock Mr. Shumaker, reporter for the Daily Morum, when ...

 

By the refrigerator, what did he see, but bodacious, beautiful bodies three.  Yeah!

 

Camera pans across the lower backs of Ms. Brignac (Yeah!), Ms. McKinney (Yeah!) and Mr. Stuart (Oh, Yeah!) and cuts back to our hero in awed lustification.  He snaps for his trusty side-kick Mr. Bowman who hands him a big black suitcase and kneels to kiss Our Hero’s platforms.  Our Hero opens the case to reveal his secret weapon, his trusty 20 megaton glasses, yeah!  He closes the case and hands it to Mr. Bowman who genuflects, Ouch!, and backs away.  Ms. McKinney turns and says: boy what you lookin’ at?  Our Hero smiles, adjusts his glasses and says, hey girl, what's your sign?  She is overcome with rapture and falls down dead on the spot.  Mr. Stuart turns around and is stunned by Our Hero’s groovin’ vibe.  Our Hero just points in his direction and Mr. Stuart is swooning with joy, flies through the ceiling and explodes, yeah!  Then Ms. Brignac turns and says: Help me Obi-Wan Kenobi, your my only hope.  Can you dig it?  Mr. Choi says, girl, hey baby, you gotta bring me some water, cause you set my SOUL on fire!

 

Camera slowly zooms on her eyes, then slow zooms on his eyes

 

Cue bad 70’s LOVE theme.  Fade.


 

 

Scene 2 -- the next day

 

The meeting was called to order at 7:35.  Three first-time guests and four second or third-time guests rose and were recognized.  Just Call Him LOGUE was appointed critic.

In Committee Reports, Ms. Tomlinson gave the softball report.  Wampum wants You!  Mr. Hortman rose to announce that dues are due.  Also, as hall preservation chair to discuss the color of the hall’s interior.  Ms. Shillingron rose as Programs chair to announce a meeting to discuss the Spring Banquet.  Mr. Gable rose as Publicity chair to announce the speech contest and the flyers.  Mr. Shumaker rose to ask about speakers’ keys.

In Old Business, Mr. Van Meter rose to argue that the walls look better now than the past white would look like.  Argued, Yellow is just better, and we should not be blindly devoted to history.  (With this, Old Business began to take on the tune and timbre of New Business, lasting, all told, an hour and 15 minutes.)

Mr. Stuart rose to agree with Mr. Van Meter.  Changing wall color would ignore 90 years of history in the yellow walled society.  Aesthetically, yellow is better.

Mr. Hortman rose to defend his position on changing the walls back to their original white.  Said they may not be able to make ANY changes if wall color is not included.

Mr. Pyrdum rose to clarify the question, not about history, it's about paint color.  Need to choose expertise over emotion.

Ms. Tomlinson said that if we restore the hall, we should do it all the way.  We can always change the color of the walls.

Mr. Weaver debated that this debate is wrong.  We are not a museum.  Serber and Barber don’t live here and the building is historic because of us!  He doesn't like either color, but agrees that it is entirely our choice

Dr. Parkes rose and reiterated: history is now!  The color of the walls is a question of taste.  Architects are often wrong and we need to exercise autonomy.  Something lewd about virgin walls.

At this time, the Chief Justice and other assorted members of the Brickheap society for wayward girls came over to present an acceptance to our challenge of intersociety debate.  They chose to debate in opposition to our resolution.

As there was, amazingly, no question to be called and no further old business, the society moved into new business and, Mr. Van Meter rose to recall the terrible foreign policy of Neville Chamberlain, and to compare President Clinton’s policies in China with those of Chamberlain.  He presented: Be It Resolved, Clinton will be remembered as the Neville Chamberlain of the 90’s for his policy of engagement with China.  Respectfully, Ryan J. Van Meter.

Mr. Hortman rose to say that China had a divergent history of ... something.  Said China is indeed communist and has a billion citizens.  We should stop them before they become aggressive.

Ms. Tomlinson rose to agree with the resolution.  Said Clinton is trying too hard to make a name for himself and not hard enough to make human rights an issue in foreign policy.

Mr. Stuart rose to explain the threat of China.  Also explained the Art of War, by Sun Tsu, Chinese, deceased.  Said we need to actively rearm to protect our interests in the Pacific.

Mr. Weir rose to disagree with the previous speaker.  The Chinese are NOT imperialistic and have always been inward-looking. China is not Hitler’s Germany

Mr. de Guzrnan (guest) Said that China has already taken over.  Said that Clinton didn’t have a choice in the Hong Kong decision.

Mr. Choi (member) reiterated that China is NOT an imperialistic country, they only defend their borders. China has no Hitler, not even a Deng Xiao Ping anymore.  Said that the comparison to Chamberlain is not accurate and that China is indeed moving slowly toward democracy.

Mr. Guy agrees with the resolution.  China violates our copyright laws, and their national gun company sells to gangs in California.  Said we must have trade sanctions against China.

Mr. Shumaker talks about Most Favored Nation status as a bargaining chip when dealing with China.  Said we should fight to have people represented in foreign policy.

Ms. Ramirez talked about Nickelodeon’s green slime as an analogy to China.  Said that Supply and Demand fuels their economy as much as ours, and that if we don't like China, we should not buy their products.

Mr. Weaver opposed the resolution for historical reasons.  China is nothing like WWII Germany, and the Hong Kong lease was signed by the UK not the US.  Said that it is not Clinton’s job to interfere in this case and that does not make him a Chinese puppet.

A motion was made; the question was called; the resolution passes 8-7

 

Mr. Shumaker then rose and asked: Why do we do things?  Said that there is no altruism, and presented: Be It Resolved, Self-Interest is the only interest that determines human actions.  Respectfiilly, Michael J. Shumaker.

Mr. Stuart rose to oppose the resolution because it is WRONG!  Gave two examples of altruism: Jesus and Ghandi.  Altruism does exist.

Mr. Van Meter said that self interest is not the only motivation, even though is a main one.  Going down with the ship is plain stupidity, not self-interest

Mr. Shockley (guest) said we first needed to define self-interest, which he though must have meant what each person thinks is important himself.  This cannot be evaluated universally and is personal to each person.

Mr. Pyrdum said we must define self-interest in order to clarify resolution: self-gratification vs. self-preservation argument. Further stated that something must go on outside of the self.

Mr. Hudson said that he is a masochist (no big surprise).  Agrees with the resolution because we are acting out of our interest (any conscious, thought-out choice). except possibly in the case of pathological actions.

Mr. Gable did much train smashing. Made a distinction between self-interest and perceived self-interest and said this can change after 4 shots of tequila

Mr. Smith questioned our perception/definition of altruism.  Said altruistic behavior is not necessarily the abandonment of one’s own interests.  Something about a mass of questions, allusions to Ayn Rand and the Usual Suspects.

The question was called and the resolution passed 7-3

The Society adjourned at 10:48 or possibly 11:15 after a rather thorough critics report from LOGUE, which included stones, metaphors, and cookie cutters.

 

 

 

INT. - THE BEDROOM  - DAY

 

Our Hero, Mr. Choi, awakes wearing nothing but glasses and a smile.  Then his head began to pound like James Brown with a missing gavel.  He had strange thoughts, like where is Mr. Brantley when I need him, and what of Mr. Pyrdum and the rebel fleet?  Was it all a dream?  No!  He reached over and felt the nice smooth body next to him.  Yeah! he's one bad mother . . . hush-your-mouth!  Just talkin’ bout Mr. Choi.

 

 

Cue bad 70’s sit-corn.

 

 

Our Hero snaps for Mr. Bowman, who runs out of the closet with a mirror.  Mr. Choi looks at himself.  Yeah, so bad I should be against the law.  When, out of the corner of the mirror, he spied the face of the girl next to him.  Gasp!  It was Mr. Hortman!  Our Hero, Mr. Choi, thought: Oh Yeah!  If the College Republicans could see him now.  Our Hero girds himself with a tight green polyester shirt, 5 inch high platforms, and 6 inch wide bell bottoms; then struts to his 11:05. Yeah, on to the next conquest.

 

Cue bad 70’s make-up and hair design

 

Fade to black.

 

Submitted respectfully on this 24th day of April, Nineteen Hundred and Ninety Seven,

Leonard D. Hudson, Secretary.

 

 

Minutes of the Demosthenian Literary Society

April 24, 1997

 

 

Ms. Yarber:      Uncle Choi, will you tell us a bed-time story?

Mr. Miller:        Yeah!

Uncle Choi:       OK, OK. Kids, settle down. Hey, what’s the magic word?

Ms. Moultrie:    Please?

Uncle Choi:       Right! OK, Here’s the one about Little Red Uncle Choi and the big bad Mr. Guy!

Mr. Miller:        Aww! You told that one already!

Uncle Choi:       Alright, then! Here’s the one about Little Uncle Choi and the 3 Demosthenians.

Satisfied?

All Kids:           Yeah!

Uncle Choi:       Well, Once upon a time, there lived, in the valley of North Campus, a brave,

handsome, talented, intelligent, virile young man named Little Uncle Choi.

Ms. Yarber:      That’s you, isn't it Uncle Choi?

Uncle Choi:       That’s right! Quit interrupting. Now, this valley was also full of horrible things,

like Mr. Pyrdum’s Shining Palace of Pleasure, and Mr. Weir’s Moral Abyss.  Not

to mention the big bad Mr. Magda!

Mr. Miller:        Aww! Last time it was Mr. Guy!

Uncle Choi:       Look, what did I say? Do you want to hear the story or not? Yes? May I

continue? Thank you. So... Where was I? Oh, Little Uncle Choi had been

wandering the valley looking for a swank lemonade stand and had lost his way.

He had grown tired and hungry in his search. In desperation, he stopped by Dr. Parkes’ house and asked for some food and a warm place to rest. Dr. Parkes said,

“It’s. . . It’s not good really. No . . . No, not good at all.”

Ms. Moultrie:    That didn’t sound like Dr. Parkes!

Uncle Choi:       Work with me here, alright? Now, Little Uncle Choi, despondant, goes to local

black man Ms. Shillington’s house and asks him for some food and a warm place

to rest.  He tells Little Uncle Choi that there is an open house at someplace called

Demosthenian that night, along with a few other words that Uncle Choi can’t tell

little children.

Mr. Miller:        Aww! Tell us the words!

Uncle Choi:       Aren’t you asleep yet? Now, Little Uncle Choi approached the strange house by

The Academic Building and slowly crept inside. Then...