Minutes of the DLS: March 30, 2000

 

Demosthenian Meeting for the 30th March, 2000

With the Masters starting this week, I should keep you informed how our own Mr. Rivner is performing.  Paired off with Mr. Woods, we thought he may have done ok.  Not the case I’m afraid.  After the first hole he was 9 above par.  By the 9th hole Rivner was in the 19th hole trying to drink away his sorrows.  Well, while sat at the bar he saw the letter from his grandmother in the pocket.  It asked him to send a recent picture of him.  After last night’s shananigans Rivner pulled the naked polaroid of himself out, cut it in two and put one half in the return envelope.  Unfortunately, as he was a little drunk he had got mixed up and put the lower half in the envelope.  This is ok though he thought because his grandmother has bad sight.  Well, Mr. Rivner gets a phone call later in the week from his grandmother.  She said “Asher, dear, I’m glad you’re doing well, only, you really need to change your hair style because it makes your nose look small.”  Mr. Rivner wasn’t the only one who got bad news this week.  Mr. Slone, our resident financial wizard (Even if he wasn’t our financial wizard, he is now).. Lost over $5million this week on the wild rollercoaster ride that was the Tech stocks.  When asked what happened, he said, “Mr. Goodhew reconmended investing in his rival company, so I did.. Unfortunately, PK’s e-PK lost $40 on the share on Tuesday, and declared bankcrupcy.  I think it was a late April fool’s joke.  I’m not talking to Mr. Goodhew now.

The meeting was called to order with three first time guests and two second or third time guests.  Two applications for membership were accepted.  The theme of the evening seemed to be sex and nakedness with Ms. Boggs talking about her belt, I mean skirt, and Ms. Dunham talking about the social implications of being naked.

Ms. Bennewitz gave her weekly financial committee report and we moved into new business.

Mr. Slone began by explaining how he takes a pill every morning to keep his blood pressure down.  He went on to say how medical research could be covered up when Universities work with corporations on research.  He also spoke about the limit to academic freedom and free exchange of ideas.  He presented:  Be it resolved, Colleges and Universities should no longer be allowed to accept grants from corporations.  Respectfully submitted, Jeff Slone.

Ms. Bennewitz has seen the huge files on CEOs in the Presidents office.  Companies pay more money than any one individual.

Mr. Dick said that competition is good in the academic setting.  We wouldn’t have the great buildings and teachers without the investment from corporations.

Mr. Patton asked if we were in competition to build the best buildings or get the best education.

Mr. Goodhew explained how Sun Microsystems infiltrated his classroom saying to the class how Microsoft was an evil empire.  UGA allows corporations to take over the classrooms and this risks the freedom to teach.

Ms. Frawley said is not right for corporations to withhold pertinent information on drugs and shouldn’t infringe on the public interest.  Strings are often attached to the donations and they sometimes violate freedom of thought.

Mr. Wells said that UGA students should take particular interest in corporate funding as UGA is really a research school, but also state funded.  It should be the state paying, not partisan factions.

Mr. Rivner informed us of Trinity college and their founding on Kodak, also Duke on big tobacco. They are leading research Universities now.  Companies donate to look good.

Mr. Childs asked where all the funds would come from without corporations.  Why not distribute the money more fairly, not just in the science areas?

Mr. Kennedy (Guest) said that it costs $1Billion for basic UGA maintenance and HOPE can’t pay for it all.  All is fair when UGA takes a cut of the pie from the corporations.

Mr. Miller wanted the resolution changed from “corporation” to “government”, but not likely to happen.  He doesn’t want to live in a culture of fear from powerful corporations.

Ms. Phillips (Guest) said that research means nothing unless someone uses it.  Students are not interested in research, but students are. 

Ms. Arnold’s salary and research comes from corporate grants but bad things have happened from corporations granting money.  People need to think outside the box, but the companies restrict that.

The resolution was called and failed 10 to 16.

Mr. Pyrdum then grabbed the floor spoke of how America is the opposite of what the world used to be.  The 7 deadly sins are supposed to prevent movement to heaven, he presented: Be it resolved, In America, the seven deadly sins (lust, greed, gluttony, sloth, envy, wrath, and pride) are virtues.  Respectfully, Carl S Pyrdum III

Mr. Dick said that sex and violence are the way that things work.  Revelations is really the rise and fall of people.  It’s a cycle and he supported the resolution, it has to happen.

Ms. Arnold said that normal people lie somewhere between the 7 deadly sins and the 7 cardinals.

Ms. Boggs described how she loved the 7 deadly sins.  Not quite virtues though as she has guilt when she hurts someone’s feelings.

Mr. Goodhew asked us to stop thinking about ourselves.  We think less of people who behave in ways that condone these sins, such as obesity.  These aren’t virtues because we don’t look up to them.

Mr. Ramsay asked when these sins haven’t existed.  They are necessary in our lives because we operate under these sins.

Ms. Dunham said the concept of virtue is overrated.  The 7 deadly sins reflect human nature.  If we weren’t naughty once in a while the world would be boring.

Mr. Callahan said that this is the country where whenever you turn on the TV you can find the glorification of evil acts.  Women, sex, money, and power are the defining things in life.

Mr. Slone said that the presenter would have us believe that these things are less evil.  He leaves out the truly extreme examples and what would you believe, Clinton featured in many of them!

Mr. Goggans said that lust doesn’t necessarily pertain to sexual stuff.  He learned about the 7 deadly sins by learning from his life.

Ms. Spears (Guest) said that the sins were all extremes, they are virtues though as our country seems to advocate making these things extremely important.

The question was called and failed 7 to 19.

Ms. Webb then got the floor and said that there was a traitor in the midst of women.  “Ways to touch a naked man” and “How to turn a man on with a rock” seemed to be popular with Cosmo.  Playboy is a more intellectual magazine whereas Cosmo just tells its readers what to do and wear.  She presented:  Wheras Cosmo is the most sexist magazine ever, be it resolved that women need a magazine as intellectual and non-sexist as Playboy.  Respectfully submitted, Mary Webb.

Mr. Dick said that Cosmo treats men as fools.  Men are just sex objects apparently.  It doesn’t teach women how to talk intellectually.  It is sexist, to men.

Ms. Boggs said that Cosmo is sexist towards women.  Cosmo tells women how to please men, and it’s the woman’s job to be flexible.

Ms. Mikell wondered why women still buy it if it’s sexist, because everything is bright and colourful.  It’s different from a textbook, like TV, it’s an escape.

Mr. Patton said that Cosmo amuses him.  No one really believes the quizzes.  He was scared of the rock-pleasuring article!

Ms. Moultrie said that Playboy is full of feminist messages.  Playboy is awesome for men.  Men need to read it as it provides all the information (and pictures) that they need.

Mr. Callahan subscribes to Playboy and reads the articles.  Playboy can be sexist, but is a goldmine!

Ms. Kravig said that whenever women wear low-cut tops they are supporting the Cosmo image.  LIFE magazine however is a perfect alternative, even with nudity!

Mr. Rivner said that Playboy is poisonous garbage.  Not only does it control our minds, but it’s also headed by a woman!  The pictures aren’t first class either.  Read Maxim instead.

Ms. Wilson, the satirical one, said that Cosmo deeply pertains to the world and it speaks to women’s issues. 

Ms. Arnold likes Cosmo.  It’s not sexist, just stupid.  Still no basis to say that Playboy is any better though.  We need to offer women something better.

Mr. Ellington (Grad of 1984) questioned who was sexist, the magazine, or the reader?  Ways that people choose to enjoy magazines show the sexism in the reader.

The question was called and failed 6 to 13.

We then adjourned subject to Mr. Alsen’s wonderful Critic’s report.

Now for a small joke:

There was a Demosthenian standing along side a busy road chanting "88, 88, 88, 88..." until a PK brother came up to her and said, "that looks like fun, can I try?" The Demosthenian said sure so the PK chanted, "88, 88, 88, 88.."  "Well," said the Demosthenian, "that is fun. But what is even more fun is if you say it in the middle of the street" So the PKer said "OK" and stood in the middle of the street. "88, 88, 88, 88‑" BAM! she was run over by a car, completely flattened. Along the side of the road, the Demosthenian began to chant, "89, 89, 89, 89...”

Respectfully Submitted this 6th Day of the wonderful month of April, 2000,

Karl Goodhew