Table 1. Characteristics of different methods used in Memory Banking

MethodMain objective(s) Respondent/informantRemarks from experience
Collection/ presevation"To provide a physical record or ""types"" against which local names and evaluations can be checked"Local farmers can point out and name the different varieties; some are more knowledgeable than others. Considerable variation in naming varieties so source of material and information should be carefully recorded.
Rapid appraisal/preliminary participant observationTo provide a basis for framing locally relevant questions; also gives some indications as to what directions are worth pursuing Willing and accessible informants give the most information within the limited time frame. "Participant observation, even for a limited period, allows one to countercheck reports and paves the way for establishing rapport."
Benchmark socioeconomic survey"To provide ""hard(er)"" data which can later be subjected to statistical analysis of central tendencies and trends regarding the community being studied; to identify bases of internaI differentiation""Total enumeration would be ideal; where this is not possible, 20% of the total, would be satisfactory." Can help one zero in on key informants to represent different groups; quantitative data can be handy when interdisciplinary understanding is sought.
Interview with gatekeepers"To get at the ""official"" version of local events inf luencing changes in technology and diversity through time""Local officials, teachers, medicine men, leaders of associations, ruraI bank representatives, agriculturaI technicians, etc." Indispensable in seeking cooperation f or one' s project; very usefuI in providing leads to potential key informants.
Life history elicitationTo provide an indepth reconstruction of the past through the perspectives of ordinary men and women"Limited number of key informants, in this case older members of the community who have had considerable experience with the crop""May ramble unless one is prepared to direct the conversation With timely and tactful questions; provides a more candid, less censored, version of deveIopments"
Diagramming from memory"To provide some insight as to the relative importance of different features of the crop for the group as a whole and comparatively, for different groups of people""Limited number of key informants, in this case older members of the community who have had considerable experience with the crop""H ighIy interesting and most informants enjoy doing it, but results are subtIe and take time to analyze; taping informants' running commentary helps in interpreting diagrams."
Triads testTo provide clues for understanding local perspectives on relationship and contrast among varieties"Limited number of key informants, in this case older members of the community who have had considerable experience with the crop"The explanations informants give about their answers are very revealing with respect to local evatuation criteria.
Sorting/ ranking"To examine indigenous classification of, as well as preferences for, different varieties; complements triads test in elaborating users ' perspect i ve""Limited rubber of key informants, in this case older members of the community Who have had considerable experience with the crop""Time-consuming but also userfriendly; for non-literate informants, one can use actual specimens instead of written names of local varieties."
Verificatory studies/ field and market surveyTo validate results from limited sample on a broader scale; to fill gaps in information and check inconsistencies"Broader sample than key informants, but more limited than benchmark survey and not necessarily involving the same respondents""Very useful but design and execution should be given a lot of thought, otherwise, these methods may further confuse the issues"

Return