Introduction
to Fruit Crops
and Overview of the Text

Man's relationship with fruiting plants
began long before the origins
of agriculture in 8000-10,000 BC, when all human beings practiced the
hunter-gatherer
lifestyle. Fruits gathered from the wild were mainstays of our diet,
being excellent sources
of
fiber, vitamins, and other healthful or medicinal compounds unbeknownst
to us then. While cereal grains such as wheat and barley were probably
the first crop plants domesticated by humans, several of today's fruit
crops were not far behind since they were native to the very same area
- the fertile crescent of Asia Minor. Domestication of wild fruiting
plants
may have been inadvertent; the first groves of fruit trees probably
sprang
from seeds thrown in waste heaps at the edge of villages. Careful
observation
and selection for useful traits such as larger size, better taste, and
higher yield started the transformation of those wild plants into the
crops
we cultivate and enjoy today. During the age of discovery, fruits,
seeds
or live plants were often taken on transoceanic voyages, and exchanges
in both directions helped spread many crops throughout the world.
Christopher
Columbus and his contemporaries may not have realized the impact they
would
have on agriculture and society when they brought crops such as coffee
and citrus to the new world, and returned to Europe with previously
unknown,
but now common foods like cocoa and pineapple.
Today, we have well established world
trade networks
and sophisticated cultural and postharvest technologies that allow
fruits
to be enjoyed throughout much of the year, instead of mere weeks per
year
like our ancestors experienced. Global trade has made formerly rare and
exotic treats derived from fruit crops commonplace in countries with no
hope of cultivating the plants. Fruit crops are important agricultural
commodities, adding tens of billions of dollars per year to the global
economy, and being major sources of income for developing countries.
Worldwide,
over 100 million acres of land has been devoted to their production,
and
the livelihood of literally millions of farming families depends on
continued
global trade.
This text is designed to acquaint you
with the basics
of the botany, production, economic value, general culture, and food
uses
of the world's major fruit crops. It is formatted as a reference text
to
allow quick retrieval of essential facts and figures. The following
outline
is used throughout the text to facilitate information retrieval and
keep
the discussion as uniform as possible from crop to crop:
This chapter describes
the general concepts and terminology
related to each section of the outline. The book assumes only a basic
understanding
of plant biology and horticulture, and there is a glossary of terms
where
words underlined in this chapter are defined.
"Fruit Crop" Defined
One would think that the term fruit
crop would
be clearly defined - not so. In fact, one of the most frequently asked
questions from this web site is "...is the tomato a fruit or a
vegetable?"
My usual reply is "both", as it is clearly a fruit in the
botanical
sense, but a vegetable from a culinary perspective. There are also
legal
definitions on the books, since in some instances vegetables are taxed
and fruits are not (or vice-versa). I think it wise to avoid culinary
and
legal definitions since these change over time and across regions, and
the botanical definition of a fruit, being invariable, is a safer bet.
I have chosen to define fruit crop as: a perennial, edible
crop
where the economic product is the true botanical fruit or is derived
therefrom.
The term perennial eliminates crops grown as annuals such as
tomato,
pepper, melons, and corn, even though the harvested product is the
true botanical fruit. Annual cultivation practices differ markedly from
those of perennial crops, and to call these fruit crops would only
increase
the existing confusion. Note that strawberry, an herbaceous perennial,
is included in the text despite the fact that in recent decades, much
of
the acreage is replanted annually. The word edible eliminates
perennial
crops whose fruits are used for fiber like Kapok (Ceiba pentandra),
or strictly industrial oils like tung nuts (Aluerites fordii).
The
true botanical fruit is the ripened ovary plus any associated
parts,
and contains the seeds of the plant. While most would not consider
coffee
and cacao fruit crops, they fit my definition since they're perennials,
and coffee and cocoa are just roasted, ground up seeds of the fruit.
African
oil palm, coconut and olive might not strike you as fruit crops either,
but again, they fit the definition since coconut, olive and palm oils
are
edible and derived from a true botanical fruit (all drupes). A nut
is a dry, indehiscent fruit with a hard shell, and accordingly, several
nut crops are included in the text.
To the Top
TAXONOMY
Plant Names
The scientific or Latin name of a plant
is extremely
important, as common names vary with location and language spoken.
Taxonomic
classification places a plant in a large group of related plants (a
family),
and assigns to it an official name, based largely on Latin and Greek
root
words. Scientific names generally consist of two italicized words, the
first denoting the genus, the second a species within that genus. For
example,
Malus domestica is the name for the cultivated apple, where Malus
is the genus and domestica the species name. In Latin, Malus
is a noun meaning apple, or alternatively evil, bad or wrong. [The dual
meaning probably stems from the biblical story of Eve and the forbidden
fruit in the Garden of Eden]. The species name domestica is an
adjective
meaning "around the house", thus the entire name translates roughly to
the domesticated apple. Last but not least, someone always has to take
credit for things, so the authority is tacked on to the scientific name
denoting the person who named the plant. In the case of the apple, it
was
a botanist named Borkhausen, so the precise, full name for the apple
is:
Malus domestica Borkh.
Linneaus, the father of botany, named
many plants,
which explains the capital letter "L" found at the end of many plant
names,
such as Pyrus communis L. (pear). The authority is often omitted
in popular literature, on nursery tags, or in plant catalogs, so
outside
of scientific literature it is not often seen. The authority is not
italicized,
but typically abbreviated, and there are literally thousands of these
abbreviations
in use today.
To make matters more complex, some plants have
been named or renamed several times, so two or more scientific names
may
be found for the same plant (see sidebar). For example, the Asian pear,
Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm. f.) Nak., also is named Pyrus serotina
L., so you may see either name used. Yes, this somewhat defeats the
purpose
of using a unique, scientific name for a given plant, but opinions vary
as to which is "right".
We are all familiar with different types
of fruits
within a species, such as 'Red Delicious', 'Golden Delicious', and
'Granny
Smith' apples. Horticulturists refer to these subspecies as "cultivars",
which means "cultivated varieties". The term "variety"
often is used interchangeably with cultivar, although purists prefer
the
latter. Note the convention of enclosing the cultivar name in single
quotes.
The precise name of that green, crisp apple we see in grocery stores is
therefore:
Malus domestica Borkh. 'Granny Smith', or
alternatively written as
Malus domestica Borkh. cv. Granny
Smith.
An even finer level of detail is found in some plants,
the strain or sport. This is equivalent to a
sub-subspecies,
or a form, where within a cultivar we have several slight variations
that
have horticultural importance. An example would be 'UltraEarli Fuji'
apple,
which is a strain of 'Fuji' apple that ripens a bit earlier than the
original
'Fuji'. As in this example, strains are often given a new cultivar name
if they become commercially important. Another example is 'Red Max', a
strain of 'McIntosh' apple with deeper red color. While this seems like
the splitting of hairs, it is useful to note that, in this example,
'Red
Max' and 'McIntosh' are genetically more similar than are 'Fuji' and
'McIntosh'.
A few more points will help clarify the use of plant names:
- After the first reference to a genus in the text, the
genus name is often abbreviated using only the first letter. For
example,
in the chapter on apple, I discuss species related to Malus
domestica
and refer to these as M. floribunda, M. sargentii, M. micromalus,
etc., hoping that you understand that the "M." stands for "Malus"
in each case; this saves valuable typing time for the author and a few
drops of ink for publishers.
- A multiplication sign "X" placed between the
genus and species denotes an interspecific hybrid
within
that genus. An example is the name for the cultivated strawberry, Fragaria
X ananassa, which was originally developed by crossing Fragaria
chiloensis with Fragaria virginiana.
- Some genera of plants are so poorly characterized, so
diverse, or contain hybrids with complex parentage derived from so many
species, that it is convenient to refer to them as a group using the
abbreviation
"spp.". Among fruit crops, blackberries are a good example of
this,
often referred to as Rubus spp.
Figure 1.1 shows an
abbreviated family tree for the
Rosaceae, or Rose family (one of the most important families of
horticultural
plants). A family is the major botanical classification group above the
genus level, often containing hundreds or thousands of species. Note
also
the subfamily and subgenus levels, which are useful in pointing out the
finer details of genetic relationships among various crops. For
example,
apple, peach, pear, and plum are all members of the Rose family, but
apple
is more closely related to pear (both in subfamily Pomoideae) than to
peach
or plum (Prunoideae). The text lists the family and sometimes the
subfamily
or subgenus, to give you a sense of the broader genetic background and
interrelationships for each crop.

Figure 1.1.
Family tree of the Rosaceae,
showing the relationships among important fruit crops. The other 3
subfamilies
- Spiraeoideae, Chrysobalanoideae, and Neuradoideae - are not shown as
they do not contain major crops.
Cultivars
For each crop, I discuss only the major
cultivars
or groups of cultivars. Even brief descriptions of the many cultivars
grown
would require a doubling of the length of the text. Cultivars change
over
time, and vary across different fruit growing regions, making it
impossible
to cover adequately and keep the text as concise as possible. Several
other
texts or sources are devoted to cultivar descriptions, including some
listed
below, and I have included one or two references for each crop that
give
more detail on cultivars.
Some helpful references on taxonomy in
relation to
fruit crops:
Bailey et al. 1976. Hortus Third: A
concise dictionary
of plants cultivated in the United States and Canada. Macmillan Publ.,
New York.
Borror, D.J. 1960. Dictionary of word roots and combining
forms. Mayfield Publ Co., Mountain View, CA.
Downing, C. 1872. Downing's
encyclopaedia of fruits
and fruit trees of America: part I and part II. John Wiley & Son,
New
York.
Facciola, S. 1990. Cornucopia: a source book of edible
plants. Kampong Publications, Vista, CA.
Hedrick, U.P. 1922. Cyclopedia of
hardy fruits. MacMillan
Co., New York.
Lawrence, G.H.M. 1951. Taxonomy of vascular plants.
MacMillan Publ. Co., New York.
Moore, J.N. and J.R. Ballington (eds.). 1995. Genetic
resources of temperate fruit and nut crops. Acta Horticulturae 290.
Vols. 1&2.
Morton, J.F. 1987. Fruits of warm
climates. Julia
F. Morton, Publ., Miami, FL.
Popenoe, W. 1927. Manual of
tropical and subtropical
fruits. MacMillan Co., New York.
Samson, J.A. 1986. Tropical Fruits, 2nd edition. Longman
Science and Technical, Essex, UK.
Whealy, K. And S. Demuth (eds.).
1993. Fruit, berry, and nut inventory,
2nd edition. Seed Saver Publ., Decorah, Iowa.
Wiersema, J.H. and B. Leon. 1999. World
economic
plants: a standard reference. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
The national plant germplasm database maintained
by the USDA
http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/searchgrin.html
To the
Top
ORIGIN, HISTORY OF CULTIVATION
The center of diversity of a plant
species denotes the area of the world
where the species evolved and is found growing in the wild. It is
interesting
to note that many of the fruit crops (and crop plants in general) grown
in the United States are not native to North America. Perhaps more
interesting
is that several cultivated fruits are not found in the wild, indicating
that man has hybridized or selected the species over time to make it
very
different from its wild progenitors. It is not surprising, therefore,
that
many of the world's most common fruits are native to the area where
agriculture
had its roots - Asia Minor and China.
Knowledge of soil and climatic
conditions occurring in the native range
give us clues about site selection and cultural methods that should be
employed when growing these crops in foreign areas. Also, plant
breeders
often return to these centers of diversity to collect germplasm
useful for disease and pest resistance or other traits. A brief history
of cultivation is provided for each crop in the text. Lessons from
history
have been valuable in shaping the way we grow crops today.
References on crop origins,
history:
Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, germs, and steel: the fates of human societies.
W.W. Norton & Co., New York.
Evans, L.T. 1998. Feeding the ten
billion: plants and population growth.
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Upshall, W.H. (ed). 1976. History of
fruit growing and handling in the
United States and Canada 1860-1972. Regatta City Press, Kelowna, BC,
Canada.
FOLKLORE, MEDICINAL
PROPERTIES, NON-FOOD USAGE
Fruits have more than just nutritional
value to us; some may contain
anti-cancer compounds while others may cause health problems or even
death.
In this section, I have compiled information from various sources on
the
folklore, myths, healing properties, and symbolism that has surrounded
fruits for centuries. Some of the information on medicinal properties
is
well-documented, but some of it is speculative. Consult the sources
below
for more information on medicinal properties of fruits and other
plants.
References on folklore, medicinal
properties, non-food usage:
Duke, J.A. 2001. CRC handbook of nuts. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Duke, J.A. and J.L. DuCellier. 1993. CRC handbook of alternative cash
crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Lewis and Elvin-Lewis. 1977. Medical Botany: plants affecting
man's
health. John Wiley and Sons, NY.
Morton, J.F. 1987. Fruits of warm
climates. Julia F. Morton, Publ.,
Miami, FL.
Ritchason. 1995. The little herb
encyclopedia: the handbook of nature's
remedies for A healthier life. Woodland Health Books, Pleasant Grove,
UT.
To the Top
PRODUCTION
The production in terms of metric tons
(MT) per year (1 metric ton=2200
lb or 1000 kg) or percentage of total is given for the world and the
United
States. Generally, publication of this data runs about 1-2 years behind
the times. In the text, I have used the year 2002 since these data were
fairly solid by 2004 when the book was written. Primary sources for
this
are the Food & Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
(FAO),
and the USDA Agricultural Statistics Service. In some cases, state
agencies
or commodity groups have been contacted for these data. Most states in
the USA have agricultural statistics services that produce annual
reports
of agricultural production. Much of this data can now be accessed from
the Internet, which is generally more up to date:
FAO - http://apps.fao.org/default.htm
USDA -
http://www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/agstats.htm
Table 1.1 The world's top 20 fruit
crops
ranked in terms of weight of production per year (FAO 2002).
Crop
|
World
Production
(Metric Tons)
|
Leading
country
|
Land Area
(million acres)
|
1. African oil palm
|
131,122,544
|
Maylaysia
|
27
|
2. Banana
|
69,832,378
|
India
|
11
|
3. Orange
|
64,128,523
|
Brazil
|
9
|
4. Grape
|
61,018,250
|
Italy
|
18
|
5. Apple
|
57,094,939
|
China
|
12.5
|
6. Coconut
|
53,090,561
|
Phillippines
|
26
|
7. Plantain
|
32,750,510
|
Uganda
|
12.5
|
8. Mango
|
26,147,900
|
India
|
8.5
|
9. Tangerine
|
18,792,909
|
China
|
4.2
|
10. Pear
|
17,115,205
|
China
|
3.9
|
11. Pineapple
|
14,853,339
|
Thiland
|
1.9
|
12. Olive
|
15,724,187
|
Spain
|
20.5
|
13. Peach/nectarine
|
13,815,213
|
China
|
3.3
|
14. Lemon/lime
|
11,227,173
|
Mexico
|
1.9
|
15. Plum
|
9,314,727
|
China
|
5.4
|
16. Coffee
|
7,667,536
|
Brazil
|
26
|
17. Date
|
6,405,178
|
Egypt
|
2.7
|
18. Papaya
|
5,950,722
|
Brazil
|
0.4
|
19. Grapefruit/pummelo
|
4,979,781
|
USA
|
0.6
|
20. Strawberry
|
3,237,533
|
USA
|
0.5
|
The world's top 20 fruit crops,
ranked in terms of amount of production per year, are given in Table
1.1. I've been compiling the top 20 list since 1988, and in my
experience, changes are rather minor from year to year. The number 2
spot has rotated among sweet orange, banana, and grape, and other crop
rankings move one or two places over time. Keep in mind that FAO
statistics are estimates at best, and keeping up with the dozens of
fruit crops grown in over 200 countries worldwide is a daunting task.
It is worth noting that FAO reports an "NES" category, meaning "not
elsewhere specified", which includes minor fruit crops such as
pomegranate, carambola, and guava, as well as some major crops like
mango that are misidentified. In all, the NES categories include over
43 million metric tons of fleshy fruits and half a million metric tons
of nut crops that collectively would rank #7 in the top 20 list. This
statistic is reflective of the great diversity of fruit crops grown
around the world. The text covers the top 20, plus the major nuts
crops, and a few others of importance native to North America such as
blueberry and blackberry.
To the Top
In the courses I
teach, this section is where I spend most of the lecture time. There is
a considerable amount of terminology, and it is useful to consult the
glossary as you read. The references listed at the end of this section
have been invaluable to me, and are highly recommended for further
study.
Plant
Most fruit crops are perennial trees,
shrubs, or vines. Trees are large
woody plants which generally produce
a single main stem or trunk, where the renewal growth occurs at the
shoot tips in the canopy. The latter is an important distinction
between trees and shrubs, since large shrubs can be trained to a single
stem, but tend to produce new growth from the base or crown.
Vines or lianas are woody plants
that are trained to have a single trunk at the base, but use twining
stems or tendrils to
support the canopy. Vines rarely have large trunks
like trees since they support themselves by climbing on taller plants
in nature, or on trellises in cultivation. As a result, vines spend
little of their energy on supportive wood, while growing very tall and
maximizing leaf exposure to sunlight.
Leaves take many forms, being
compound if composed
of two or more leaflets, or simple
if just a
single leaf blade (Figure 1.2). Characterizing the foliage is a great
way to start the process of keying out a plant. Several terms are used
to describe the overall shape, tip, and margins of leaves or leaflets
(Figure 1.3)
Figure 1.2 Compound and simple
leaves and their associated parts. The compound leaf shown has a single
terminal leaflet, and therefore an uneven number of leaflets. This is
termed "odd pinnate", whereas leaves lacking the single terminal
leaflet are "even pinnate".



Figure 1.3. Terminology used to describe the overall shapes,
tips, and margins of leaves.
Flowers
The floral morphology of a fruit crop
is important in determining the mode of pollination (i.e., wind or
insect) and type of fruit that will arise when the ovary matures. A
complete flower is
one possessing all four fundamental appendages:
sepals, petals, stamens
and pistils. An incomplete flower lacks one
or
more of these features. The position of the base of the pistil, or
ovary, with respect to the other three appendages is important in
identification, and also partially determines what the fruit type will
be. The two most common positions are inferior (epigynous) and superior
(hypogynous). A third possibility is "half-inferior"
(perigynous), as
found in the stone fruits
(Prunus spp.). Figure 1.4
shows that a
superior ovary sits above the point of attachment of the sepals,
petals, and stamens, whereas the inferior ovary is embedded within the
receptacle, below the
point of attachment of the other floral organs. A
perigynous ovary sits within a hypanthium or floral cup.
Different
fruit types arise from the flowers shown, partly as a result of the
difference in ovary position.

|

|
Figure 1.4 Superior and inferior
ovary position in idealized flowers (above). Below, examples of ovary
position in fruit crops: left, a superior ovary in thornless key lime
flowers; middle, an inferior ovary of an Asian pear at petal fall;
right, a perigynous ovary surrounded by the hypanthium in sweet cherry.
A perfect flower possesses
both
male (stamens) and female (pistil) parts, whereas an imperfect flower
may be either staminate
(functionally male, having only stamens) or
pistillate
(functionally female, having only a pistil or pistils). The
style is very short or
lacking in some pistillate flowers, like
in pecan, but the stigma
and ovary are always present if the
pistil is functional. If staminate and pistillate flowers are borne on
the same plant but in different locations, the species is termed
monoecious. If
staminate and pistillate flowers occur only on different
plants, the species is termed dioecious.
One can see the ramifications
for pollination and
orchard design: a dioecious species such as
pistachio or kiwifruit must be planted in an orchard with male plants
near females for pollination. Aside from pollination, the male plants
are useless since they do not possess ovaries that will ripen into
fruit.
An inflorescence is a cluster
of
flowers, and there are several terms for specific inflorescences
(Figure 1.5). Generally, inflorescences fall into two categories,
determinate and indeterminate. In a
determinate inflorescence, the
top-most flower is the most mature, and generally opens first, whereas
the top-most flower in an indeterminate inflorescence is the least
mature and last to appear. The most common inflorescence types in fruit
crops are indeterminate (spikes,
racemes, panicles, umbels, corymbs),
with the cyme being
the most common determinate inflorescence.

Figure 1.5. Stick figures of different inflorescence types commonly
seen in fruit crops. See glossary for complete definitions.
Pollination
Pollination is the
transfer of pollen
from the anther to
the stigma. This is usually
mediated by the wind or an insect. In some cases, hummingbirds (wild
pineapple), bats (wild bananas), or other animals may play the role of
pollinator, but most
fruits are pollinated by the familiar honey bee
(Apis mellifera).
Once the pollen is transferred, the pollen grain will germinate on the
stigma, and the pollen tube will
grow downward until it reaches an
ovule. This may take a
few days. The pollen tube, under control of the
tube nucleus, allows for the movement of the two generative nuclei
through the style and into the ovule. The processes of pollination and
fertilization are depicted in Figure 1.6.

Figure 1.6. Simplified diagram of pollination and fertilization within
a typical flower pistil. Some of the details within the embryo sac
(exploded view at right) have been omitted for clarity. See text for
explanation.
Upon release of the generative nuclei within the embryo sac, the
process of double fertilization
occurs, involving two fusion events
(hence the name, "double
fertilization"): one generative nucleus unites
with the egg nucleus,
and the other generative nucleus unites with two
polar nuclei, yielding
the zygote and endosperm, respectively.
You may
want to review the details of double fertilization in one of the
references listed below (which will show all of the other details left
out for the sake of clarity). Suffice it to say that the end-product of
double fertilization is the seed.
When a fruit containing seeds is
deposited in a suitable place, the seeds germinate, and the life cycle
of the plant is completed.
At this point, one might ask: why is pollination necessary for fruit
culture, given that seeds are undesirable in fruits from a marketing
standpoint? The short answer is that seed development is the
prerequisite for fruit set.
From the plant's perspective, a fruit
functions in seed dissemination. Therefore, investing a great quantity
of photosynthetic energy into a fruit that doesn't contain viable seed
is wasteful. Unpollinated and unfertilized ovaries are therefore
dropped from the plant shortly after bloom, as there is no need to
invest resources into fruits that cannot aid in the reproductive
success of the species. Physiologically, the developing embryos within
seeds produce growth regulators that prevent abscission of fruitlets,
and cause the fruit tissue in the vicinity of the seed to grow. Thus,
dropping of unfertilized ovaries after bloom is "pre-programmed", and
prevented only if there is one or more developing seeds present. In
fruits with multiple seeds, poor pollination and low seed set results
in misshapen or asymmetrical fruit that are often unmarketable (Figure
1.7).
Figure 1.7 A lopsided apple (left)
resulting from poor pollination and seed set in only 3 of the 5 locules
(center). The right side of the fruit was stimulated to grow more than
the left since it was in closer proximity to the developing seeds. On
the strawberry (right), the normal fruit at left has uniform achene set
across the surface, whereas the fruit at right shows an area of poor
set and subsequent underdevelopment.
Having said that, it must have
dawned on you by now that there are
several types of seedless fruit, and the above argument does not always
hold. Fruits that set and mature without seed are termed
parthenocarpic, and these species, although rare in nature, have
been
exploited by horticulturists to a great extent. Examples include
Persian lime, some seedless oranges and tangerines, banana, and
pineapple. Seedless grapes are perhaps the best known seedless fruits,
but are not truly parthenocarpic. They undergo pollination and
fertilization, but seed development is aborted shortly afterwards; this
situation is termed stenospermocarpy.
Cross-pollination and self-pollination are
important terms. Some fruit
crops require genetically distinct pollen for fertilization and fruit
set to take place, and set fruit poorly if their own pollen is used.
These species are planted in orchards with two or more cross-compatible
cultivars to favor cross-pollination. On the other hand, some species
set more than enough fruit when pollinated by themselves. Such
self-pollinating species can be grown in large orchards composed of a
single cultivar, which are easier to manage. The cultivar used as a
source of compatible pollen is referred to as a pollinizer for
cross-pollinating species. Note that transfer of pollen between one
flower and another on the same tree is still considered
self-pollination, as is the case when pollen is transferred between
flowers on separate trees of the same genotype. The key to
cross-pollination is having a genetic distinction between the pollen
source and recipient.
Many cross-pollinating species exhibit self-incompatibility, such
that
fertilization by their own pollen is disfavored or prevented through
physical or biochemical factors. There are different degrees of
self-incompatibility, and many self-incompatible species will produce a
few fruit even when self-pollinated. Thus, a single apple tree in your
backyard may have a bushel or so of fruit, since apples are not
completely self-incompatible, but the same tree may produce several
bushels if cross-pollinated. Horticulturists have coined the terms
"self-fruitful" and "self-unfruitful" to
describe cultivars that can
set commercial crops, or cannot set commercial crops (respectively)
when self-pollinated. Thus, self-fruitful and self-unfruitful are
economic or horticultural terms, whereas "self-incompatible" or
"cross-incompatible"
are botanical terms.
Highly self-incompatible cultivars or species are often referred to as
"self-sterile", which
is technically incorrect. The term "sterile"
implies that there is either no viable pollen or no viable eggs to be
fertilized. If a cultivar is truly male sterile, for example, its
pollen could not fertilize its own
or any other egg; the pollen is
simply non-functional. Likewise, a female sterile cultivar will not
produce viable seed regardless of the pollinizer used. The rabbiteye
blueberry (Vaccinium ashei) is
a good example of misuse of these terms.
When two cultivars of rabbiteye are inter-planted, fruit set is often
50% or more on both cultivars, but if either is planted alone, only
about 2% of flowers will set fruit. The latter causes people to think
that rabbiteyes are self-sterile. But, since fruit sets on both
cultivars when cross-pollination occurs, this indicates that the pollen
and eggs of both cultivars are viable (not sterile); rabbiteyes are
simply highly self-incompatible.
Fruit
Fruits are matured ovaries plus any
associated flower parts, and contain the seeds of the plant. The ovary
may be subdivided into two or more carpels (then termed
compound ovary)
each bearing one to many ovules. Individual carpels develop into
sections of a whole fruit, as with citrus where each familiar segment
of the fruit represents one matured carpel. If the ovary is not
subdivided, then it is termed simple. The ovules will mature into seeds
if fertilized.

The ovary has three layers of tissue:
the exocarp
(outermost), mesocarp
(middle), and endocarp
(innermost) (Figure 1.8). These layers may
develop into distinct parts of
the fruit. Generally, the exocarp
becomes the fruit peel or skin, the mesocarp becomes the fruit flesh,
and the endocarp becomes the innermost part of the flesh or a
specialized tissue surrounding the seed(s), like a pit. In many cases,
however, the three layers are indistinguishable, and the term pericarp
is applied to denote all ovarian tissues surrounding the seed(s).
Figure 1.8. Fruits
are matured ovaries, and contain the seeds of the
plant. Ovaries sometimes have distinct layers of tissues, as labeled
above, which develop into distinct structures of the fruit as shown for
a drupe. Not all fruits have such clearly demarcated tissues.
Fruit types are good
identification criteria for plants, and are often
determined by floral morphology, particularly ovary position (i.e.,
superior or inferior). The major fruit types in commercial fruit crops
are: pome, drupe, berry,
hesperidium, aggregate, accessory, multiple or
syncarp, and nut.
Use the glossary for descriptions of fruit types,
and/or the fruit key below.
Key to Common Fruit
Types
1. Fruit developed from two or
more separate flowers, or derived from an entire inflorescence
2. Fruit consists mostly of receptacle tissue, with tiny, ripened
ovaries borne along the inner wall of the hollow
receptacle......................................................................................................................
Syconium (Fig)
2. Fruit consists of tightly clustered ripened ovaries plus
the inflorescence
axis............................................................ Multiple or Syncarp (Pineapple,
Mulberry)
1. Fruit developed from a single
flower
3. Fruit developed from two or more separate ovaries
4. Fruit primarily ovarian
tissue; an aggregation fruitlets on a
receptacle............. Aggregate
(Brambles)
4. Fruit primarily non-ovarian
tissue
...............................................................
Accessory (Strawberry)
3. Fruit developed from one ovary
5. Fruit (mostly) fleshy at
maturity
6. Fruit with a thin skin, homogenous texture throughout (except seeds)
................. Berry
(Grape)
6. Fruit with heterogenous texture
7.
Outer part of fruit tough and hard, or leathery
8. Septa
(partitions) present, several to many, rind leathery ...... Hesperidium (Citrus)
8. No septa,
outer rind tough, thick
.......................................... Pepo (Watermelon)
7. Outer part of fruit soft; thin-skinned
9. Fruit with a hard, bony
endocarp surrounding the seed......... Drupe
(Peach, Mango)
9. Fruit with two or more seeds,
center with papery or cartilaginous
structure
surrounding
seeds.....................................................
Pome (Apple, Pear)
5. Fruit dry at maturity
10. Fruit indehiscent (not splitting open) at
maturity
11. Fruit
winged
................................................................................
Samara (Maple, Ash)
11. Fruit not
winged
12. Seed fused to fruit wall
......................................... Caryopsis, Grain (Corn, Wheat)
12. Seed not fused to fruit wall
13. Fruit wall bladder-like, loose and free from
seed..................... Utricle
(Spinach)
13. Fruit wall not bladder-like, close-fitting to
seed
14. Fruit
large, with hard, bony wall
............................. Nut
(Walnut, Pecan)
14. Fruit small, wall thin
.............................................. Achene (Sunflower)
10. Fruit dehiscent (splitting open) at maturity
15. Ovary
compound; fruit developed from more than one carpel
16. Fruit splitting into
one-seeded segments at maturity, but carpels not
dehiscing to release seeds
...................................................... Schizocarp (Carrot)
16. Fruit splitting open to
release seeds at maturity
17. Two carpels separated by a thin, translucent
septum
18. Fruit less than
twice as long as it is wide ........... Silicle (Shepard's purse)
18. Fruit more than twice as long as it
is wide ...................... Silique
(Mustard)
17. More
than two carpels, not separated by a thin, translucent septum
..... [Capsule]
19. Capsule opening along a
transverse circular line; top separating
like a lid
............................... Circumscissile
capsule or Pyxis (Brazil Nut)
19. Capsule opening lengthwise or
by pores, top not separating like a lid
20.
Capsule opening by pores or flaps ........... Poricidal capsule (Poppy)
20. Capsule opening
longitudinally, often lengthwise
21. Capsule dehiscing through locules
..... Loculicidal capsule
(Iris)
21.
Capsule dehiscing through septa .....Septicidal
capsule (Yucca)
15. Ovary
simple; fruit developed from one carpel
22. Fruit opening along a single
suture .............................................. Follicle (Milkweed)
22. Fruit opening along two
sutures
23. Fruit not constricted between seeds
................................. Legume
(Pea, Bean)
23. Fruit constricted between seeds, sometimes
breaking into
one-seed segments
.................................................................
Loment (Desmodium)
The fruit bearing habit of
a plant refers to the position and type of
wood on which flower buds, and subsequently fruits, occur. This is
important in pruning and training, because we want to encourage the
type of wood that bears the fruit and minimize unnecessary vegetative
growth. Some species are spur
bearing, where fruit are borne on very
short, slow-growing, lateral branches (Figure 1.9). Spurs develop on
2-year-old and older wood, and may grow only ¼" per year; thus,
the fruit are borne at nearly the same points in the canopy from year
to year. For spur-bearing species, it is important to keep good light
exposure throughout the canopy because shaded spurs fail to form flower
buds for next year's crop. Lateral-bearing species produce fruit from
lateral buds on 1-year-old wood. For these species, it is important to
stimulate ample growth each year (by dormant pruning, fertilizing, etc)
so that enough fruiting shoots are available for the next year. A
number of crops bear fruit on current season's growth, either laterally
as in grape, or terminally as in walnut or mango. Some of the tropical
crops exhibit cauliflory,
where fruit are borne on large branches or
trunks of trees (e.g., cacao).

Figure 1.9. The two most common bearing habits of fruit crops: spur and
lateral. Spurs are simply short, lateral branches that occur on
2-year-old and older wood. Apple, pear, and sweet cherry are examples
of spur bearing species. Lateral bearing species produce fruit from
lateral buds on 1-year-old or current season's growth, and include
peach and grape.
Thinning refers to
the partial removal of flowers or fruitlets in order
to improve the size of the remaining fruit. Thinning is often practiced
for large-fruited species that normally set too many fruit. By
thinning, one directs the available photosynthate produced by
the
leaves into fewer, but ultimately larger fruit, rather than many small,
unmarketable fruit.
Thinning is accomplished by hand
usually, and is obviously very labor
intensive and expensive. Flowers or fruits are removed such that a
certain number of fruit per tree, or a certain spacing between fruit on
a limb is achieved. For example, apples are thinned to 1 fruit per
spur, with spurs spaced about 4-6" apart, resulting in the removal of
about 80% of the original number of fruitlets (Figure 1.10). Thinning
should be uniform throughout the canopy, as fruit in clusters will
remain small even if the correct total number of fruit are left. In
some species, chemicals can be sprayed on trees to kill flowers or
induce drop of fruitlets. Chemical thinning is less expensive, but
riskier since the degree of thinning depends not only on chemical and
concentration, but on weather, cultivar, stage of fruit development,
and skill of the orchardist.

|

|
Figure 1.10 Fruit thinning is
commonly practiced for large-fruited species, such as apple. In this
case, three fruit have been left, one per spur, spaced about 4" apart.
Spacing is important; leaving three fruit on the same spur while
removing all others would not yield the same increase in fruit size.
In terms of
timing, the earlier the tree is thinned, the better the result. When
possible, thinning at bloom provides the greatest improvement in fruit
size. However, many growers wait until the threat of frost is passed to
thin to make sure there will be enough fruit for a full crop. Much of
the benefit of thinning is lost if delayed more than about 45 days
post-bloom.
References on plant morphology,
flowering and fruiting relating to fruit crops:
Harris and Harris.
1994. Plant identification terminology: An illustrated glossary. Spring
lake Publ., Spring Lake, Utah.
Faust, M. 1989.
Physiology of temperate zone fruit trees. Jihn Wiley and Sons, New York.
Monselise, S.P.
(Ed). 1986. CRC handbook of fruit set and development. CRC Press, Boca
Raton, FL.
Nyeki, J. And M.
Soltesz (eds). 1996. Floral biology of temperate zone fruit trees and
small fruits. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, Hungary.
Sedgley, M. And
A.P. Griffin. 1989. Sexual reproduction of tree crops. Academic press,
London.
Soule, J. 1985.
Glossary for horticultural crops.
John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Westwood, M.N.
1993. Temperate zone pomology, 3rd edition. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
To the Top
For each crop, the main aspects of
cultivation can be found in this
section. The subsections include: soils and climate, propagation,
rootstocks, planting design, training, and pruning, and pest problems.
Soils and Climate
Most fruit crops grow best on
deep,
well-drained, loamy soils, with pH
of 6-7. The rare exceptions to this are noted. Climate is probably the
strongest determinant of the success of fruit cultivation. Several
aspects of climate are critical.
Cold
Hardiness. This is the minimum
temperature tolerance for the plant, often quoted in degrees F or C
causing 50% or greater mortality. The flower buds, vegetative buds, and
wood often have different killing temperatures, with flower buds being
the least hardy. Thus, a fruit tree may survive in a northern winter,
but produce little or no fruit. Maximum cold hardiness values are given
for each species in the text. It is important to note that cold
hardiness is not constant; in the summer, most fruit crops would be
killed by relatively high temperatures (i.e., 10s or 20s °F or -12
to -2°C). As they acclimate in fall and early winter, they obtain
the ability to withstand temperatures well below 0°F (-18°C) in most cases.
Conversely, as the buds begin to swell in late winter or spring,
several degrees of hardiness are lost per week (Table 2). In almost all
fruit crops, open flowers or small fruitlets can withstand only 28 to
30°F (-1 to -2°C) without injury, making most crops vulnerable
to relatively mild spring frosts. Fruit growers choose sites less prone
to frost, and/or use heaters, sprinkling, or wind machines to prevent
crop losses when frost occurs (Figure 1.11). Tropical crops are
exceptions - most have no capacity for acclimation and are killed by
brief exposure to subfreezing temperatures. Subtropical crops like
citrus and date display a modest ability to acclimate and withstand
temperatures 5-10°F below the freezing mark.
Table 1.2 Change in killing temperature of apple flowers as they
develop during late winter and early spring (modified from Proebsting
and Mills, 1978. J. Amer Soc. Hort. Sci. 103:192). Pictures below
depict a few of the stages of bud development.
|
Dormant
|
Silver tip
|
Green tip
|
Half-inch green
|
Tight cluster
|
First pink
|
First Bloom
|
Full Bloom
|
Post Bloom
|
0F
|
<-4
|
10
|
18
|
22
|
25
|
27
|
28
|
28
|
28.5
|
0C
|
<-20
|
-12
|
-7.5
|
-5.6
|
-3.9
|
-2.8
|
-2.3
|
-2.2
|
-1.9 |

Figure 1.11. Peach flowers encased in ice
during a frost event.
Sprinkler irrigation is commonly used to protect fruit crops from frost
damage in the temperate zone. The water releases heat as it freezes,
keeping flower bud temperatures above the killing point of about
28°F.
Chilling
Requirement - this is
the number of hours of exposure to 45°F (7°C) or below required
each winter to satisfy dormancy and allow normal growth the following
spring. The basic components of dormancy are depicted in Figure 1.12.
Most temperate woody plants require between 500-1500 chill hours each
winter, measured from leaf drop in autumn until February or March. If
the winter is warm, and the chilling requirement is not met, then bud
break is sporadic and light, and cropping is poor. If the plant
receives much more chilling than needed, bud break is accelerated and
often premature, resulting in frost damage. This is why it is important
to match the chilling requirement of the plant to the location, and
also why temperate species like apples cannot be grown in the tropics
where temperatures rarely drop below 60°F. For most species, there
are a few low chill cultivars
that can be grown in areas with mild
winters that would not support growth of traditional cultivars.
‘Flordaprince' peach and ‘Flordahome' pear are examples of fruit trees
bred specifically for low chilling requirement, and can be grown
successfully in Florida, southern Texas, and other warm winter
locations. Tropical crops have no chilling requirements, and although
they may often flower or break bud after winter in subtropical regions,
they do not need the cool exposure to flower or grow normally.

Figure 1.12. Typical timeline of dormancy in temperate fruit
crops
(northern hemisphere). Exposure to temperatures below 45°F
conditions plants to respond to warm temperatures in late winter and
eventually resume growth in spring.
Once the chilling requirement has been satisfied, temperate woody
plants must receive a certain number of growing degree hours in
order
to resume growth. Thus, dormancy can be thought of as a two-stage
process: a first stage requiring cool temperature exposure followed by
a stage requiring warm temperatures. Some studies suggest that the two
stages interact, i.e., a deficit in chilling causes the growing degree
hour requirement to increase, and over-chilling reduces the growing
degree hour requirement. It follows that bloom date in spring is
strongly influenced by winter weather. In areas like the eastern United
States, which experience wild fluctuations in winter weather, bloom
dates for a given fruit cultivar can vary by 3-4 weeks from year to
year.
Growing
season length - Some fruit
crops require as few as 30 days for fruit maturation, while others
require several months or over a year. Species like pecan and kiwifruit
require over 200 days between bloom and harvest for proper maturation,
hence can only be grown where the growing season is long. The growing
season is defined as the time interval between the last frost in spring
and first frost in autumn.
Sunlight
- Sunlight not only drives
photosynthesis, but also drives pigment synthesis in the fruit's skin,
and flower bud formation for next year's crop. Red color development in
apples is much greater in the sunny, desert-like climate of eastern
Washington than in the cloudy, humid climate of New York, for example.
All fruit crops except coffee and cacao perform best in full sunlight
rather than shade.
Rainfall
and humidity - Many crops
which originated in humid, rainy climates perform well where these
conditions are found. When grown in arid areas, irrigation must be
provided during the growing season. High humidity and rainfall favor
weed, disease and insect outbreaks, and fruits grown in humid regions
often require more pesticide applications to achieve the same yield and
quality as fruits grown in arid climates. This is particularly true for
species native to arid areas that have little natural pest resistance.
Temperature
during fruit maturation -
The flavor of a fruit is a function of the amounts and ratio of sugars
and organic acids
found in the pulp.
Sugars increase and acids decrease
as fruit ripen (Figure 1.13). Warm conditions during ripening favor
sugar accumulation and organic acid degradation, rendering the fruit
sweeter and richer in flavor. Cooler than desirable temperatures do the
opposite - they make the fruit more watery and tart. This is one major
reason why there are "vintage" years and poor years for wines. If the
weather during late summer/early fall is too cool, then the wine will
be acidic, dry, and perhaps low in alcohol, because the grapes never
achieved an optimal sugar level and/or sugar:acid ratio. Grape growers
hope for sunny, warm days and cool nights during maturation to obtain
maximum sugar content and the proper sugar/acid ratio. What is warm
weather for grapes may be cool weather for pineapples, so there are no
cardinal temperatures applicable to all fruits.

Figure 1.13. As fruit ripen, they accumulate sugars and lose organic
acids as shown above [Modified from Westwood, 1993].
References on climate:
Barfield, B.J. and J.F. Gerber. 1979.
Modification of the aerial
environment of crops. Amer. Soc. Agric. Engr. Monograph No. 2. St.
Joseph, Michigan.
Faust, M. 1989. Physiology of
temperate zone fruit trees. John Wiley
and Sons, New York.
Schaffer, B. and P.C. Andersen (eds).
Handbook of environmental
physiology of fruit crops (2 volumes). CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
The National Climate Data Center in
Asheville, NC provides detailed
weather data on for North America: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html
To the Top
Most
fruit crops are propagated by vegetative means to retain the exact
fruit characteristics of the parent plant. Seed propagation generally
results in highly variable fruit size, shape, color, and flavor, and
creates a management nightmare, since each seedling is genetically
different from the others. People recognized this a few thousand years
ago and began grafting,
budding, or rooting cuttings
of desirable fruit
crops, rather than planting them by seed. Today, almost all tree fruits
are grafted or budded, and most small fruits and some
grapes are grown
from cuttings. Specialized nurseries produce millions of new plants
each year, generally by growing
rootstocks for a year, then budding or
grafting them with the desired scion cultivars the
following year. Many
tropical fruit crops are still propagated by seed, including cashew,
coffee, oil palm and coconut. They are either fairly true breeding from
seed, or cannot be propagated easily by vegetative techniques.
The general
process of budding or grafting is depicted in Figure 1.14. In this
book, I give a brief description of the methods used to propagate a
given species, but if you have not studied plant propagation recently
or at all, it would behoove you to refer to one of the texts below for
general information. Several terms related to propagation are described
in the glossary.
Figure 1.14. Basic process of grafting or budding a fruit tree. The
rootstock is grown for about one year prior to grafting or budding.
Shown here is a seedling rootstock, but some rootstocks themselves are
vegetatively propagated. Once the rootstock is of sufficient size, one
or more buds from the desired scion cultivar are joined with it via a
number of techniques.
References on propagation:
Garner, R.J. 1988. The grafter's handbook,
5th edition. Cassell Publ.,
Ltd, London.
Garner, R.J. and S.A. Chaudhri. 1976.
The propagation of tropical fruit
trees. Horticultural Review N. 4, CAB International, Farnham Royal, UK.
Hartmann, H.T., D.E. Kester, and F.T.
Davies. 1990. Plant Propagation:
principles and practices, 5th edition. Prentice Hall Publ., Englewood
Cliffs, NJ.
Rom and Carlson (eds). 1987.
Rootstocks for fruit crops. Wiley
Interscience, New York.
To the Top
Rootstocks
As described above, the
rootstock is
the root system of a grafted tree.
A 2-part tree may be referred to as a "stion", which derives from
stock
+ scion. The use of grafted trees overcomes many of the problems
associated with growing trees from seed, such as:
- The exact growth, flowering,
and fruiting
characteristics of the cultivar are preserved through grafting.
- Juvenility is greatly
reduced. Grafted trees begin
fruiting at a very early age, often when only 2 or 3 years old.
Seedlings of some species may not fruit until they are 5+ years old. Pomologists say
that grafted trees are more precocious
than seedling
trees. Dwarfing rootstocks
sometimes induce more precocity than
non-dwarfing or seedling
rootstocks.
- Rootstocks allow adaptation
of scion cultivars to
climates and soils normally unfavorable for growth. Some examples
include:
- Tolerance of poor drainage
(e.g., plum
rootstocks for peach in wet soils)
- Tolerance to drought (e.g.,
Rough Lemon
rootstock for sweet orange cultivation on the droughty sands of central
Florida)
- Tolerance of high pH or
salinity (e.g., peach
x almond hybrid rootstocks for high pH tolerance of peach)
- Improved cold hardiness
and/or bloom delay of
scions (e.g., Trifoliate orange rootstock for sweet orange)
- Tolerance to soil diseases
and nematodes
(e.g., ‘Nemaguard' rootstock for root knot nematode resistance in peach)
- Rootstocks provide tree size
control in some
species. This is most widely exploited in apple, where there is a range
of tree size obtainable by using different dwarfing rootstocks. For
example, a ‘Red Delicious' tree on M.27 rootstock will be only 6 feet
tall at maturity, but would be 20+ feet tall if grafted onto an apple
seedling rootstock. The availability of dwarfing rootstocks has allowed
many innovations in tree fruit culture, such as more efficient planting
designs and training systems, reduced pesticide use, and an earlier
return on investment for orchardists.
References on rootstocks:
Rom and Carlson (eds). 1987.
Rootstocks for fruit crops. Wiley
Interscience, New York.
Tukey, H.B. 1964. Dwarfed fruit
trees. Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca, NY.
To the Top
Planting
Design, Training, Pruning
Planting Design. To achieve
high yield and the
earliest and highest return on
investment, plants must fill their allotted spaces as rapidly as
possible, and then be maintained within these spaces through annual
training and pruning. Yield of all crops is positively related to the
amount of sunlight absorbed by the leaf canopy per acre, so we
optimize
canopy shape and plant spacing, leaving just enough room between rows
to move equipment and labor. The design of an planting should consider
this concept primarily, but other factors such as pollinizer placement,
row orientation, tree density (number of trees per acre), desired tree
height, and training system are also important.
With free-standing trees, we typically see rectangular planting
schemes, where the distance between rows is wider than the distance
between trees in a row. An orchardist may say that trees are planted
20' x 15', meaning that rows of trees are 20' apart, and trees within
the row occur at 15' intervals. Tree density would be the amount of ft2
per acre (43,560) divided by the space allotted each tree (20*15=300
ft2), giving about 145 trees/acre in this example.

High density orchards
contain several hundred to a few thousand trees
per acre, and are generally made possible by dwarfing rootstocks
(Figure 1.15). In these
orchards, individual trees lose their
identity
as they are trained into continuous fruiting surfaces, looking like
long hedgerows. Dwarfing rootstocks keep trees to a manageable height,
and induce fruiting at a very early age, generally the 2nd year. Since
dwarf rootstocks are poorly anchored, high density orchards are often
supported by a trellis of 1-4 wires; the trellis also aids tree
training. Vineyards are laid out very similar to high density orchards,
using a trellis to support the vines.
Figure 1.15. A high density apple orchard
with over 1000 trees per acre.
Training
System. The training
system refers to the
shape of the canopy, which in turn is
controlled by pruning and positioning limbs. Again, the main motivation
is to maximize light absorption and induce fruiting as soon as
possible. There are many training systems for trees, but all stem from
2 basic forms: the central
leader and the open
center or vase (Figure
1.16). The central leader, and all of its variations, utilize one main
central stem (the "leader") which extends from the trunk to the top of
the canopy. At regular intervals along the leader, tiers of scaffold
branches are trained to radiate outward from the leader. Each tier of
scaffolds extends outward progressively less as you move from the
ground up. As shown in the top view, scaffold limbs are not placed
directly above another one, as the upper scaffold would shade the lower
one. The resulting canopy has a pyramidal or Christmas-tree shape. This
allows good light penetration to the lowest scaffolds, keeping them
healthy and fruitful. Central leader systems are useful for many
species, particularly those with a strong tendency to grow upright like
apple, pear, and sweet cherry (Figure 1.17).
Figure
1.16.
Stick figures of the two most popular tree training
systems. Most other training systems are modifications of these two
basic forms.
The open center system, and its variations, have scaffolds originating
from a single point on the trunk, and no scaffolds oriented upright or
in the middle of the canopy. Generally, about 4 limbs are selected 1-3
ft above the soil which are pointing in different directions (about
90° apart). These limbs are then trained to grow upward and
outward, branching repeatedly to fill one quarter of a circular canopy.
The canopy acquires a "V" or vase shape as no structural limbs are
allowed to grow in the center. This system allows good light
penetration to all branches, as light comes in from the sides and
through the center of the canopy. It is used for trees which tend to
produce rounded, dense canopies with no main leader naturally, like
peach, apricot, plum, and almond (Figure 1.17)
Figure 1.17. Dead apple and peach trees
reveal the basic framework of
central leader (left) and open center (right) trees.
Pruning. Annual pruning is necessary for most
fruit crops to keep them young,
vigorous, and healthy. However, any pruning during the formative years
of the plant extends the time it takes to fill its allotted space in
the orchard. Thus, pruning is used sparingly when training young
plants, but often practiced annually once the plant is mature.
The amount of annual pruning varies tremendously with species. For wine
grapes, about 95% of the previous season's growth is removed every
year, but for sweet cherry trees, only interfering branches and water
sprouts are removed when necessary. The severity and type of
pruning
depends on:
• inherent vigor of the tree
• anticipated regrowth response
• fruit size, or the number of fruiting sites needed
for a full crop
• the nature of the fruiting wood; i.e., spurs on 2+
year-old wood, or laterally on 1-year-old stems
• the training system
If the cultivar is inherently
vigorous, it will require more severe pruning to keep it in shape than
would a weak-growing cultivar, or one grafted on a dwarfing rootstock.
However, severe pruning invites strong, undesirable regrowth.
Therefore, while a vigorous plant requires more pruning, it should not
be pruned severely enough to stimulate unfruitful regrowth.
In large fruited species like peach, 100 lbs of fruit might be obtained
from just a few hundred fruit, since each one weighs 1/4 to ½
pound. But in the small fruited cherry, several thousand fruit may be
required to make the same 100 lbs total yield. Thus peach requires far
fewer fruiting sites than cherry, and can be pruned more severely
without a significant effect on yield.
Recall that some species bear fruit on short, lateral branches called
spurs which may produce fruit for several years. Other species produce
fruit only on elongated, 1-year-old or current season's shoots. In
spur-bearing species, we want to encourage the spurs to remain
fruitful, so light pruning is needed to keep good sunlight exposure,
but severe pruning will remove spurs or result in spurs growing out
into long, unfruitful shoots. On the other hand, the lateral bearing
species need to be pruned at least moderately to encourage formation of
new shoots for next year's crop. This underscores the importance of
proper pruning - not only does it affect this year's crop, but next
year's crop as well.
Some training systems require specialized pruning to maintain tree
form. For each crop, the text will give some details on these specific
training systems, but here I want to make a more general point on the
types of pruning cuts and their effects on regrowth.
There are two basic types of pruning cuts: heading back and
thinning out, or just heading and thinning (not to be confused
with
fruit thinning). Heading back is when a branch is cut somewhere along
its length, leaving some of it behind (Figure 1.18). Thinning out is
when a branch is removed at its point of origin, leaving none of it
behind. Pruning stimulates regrowth, regardless of the type of cut
made, but the location of regrowth varies with the cut. Specifically,
heading back causes a localized stimulus at the wound, such that
regrowth occurs from buds just below the cut. Thinning out causes a
more generalized stimulus throughout the tree canopy, and does not
stimulate regrowth at the cut.

Figure 1.18. The two basic types of pruning cuts and associated
regrowth response.

Orchardists use heading cuts
to induce branching at a specific point;
say, where a tier of scaffolds should be positioned in a young, central
leader tree. They use thinning
cuts where the canopy is too thick, or a
branch is growing in the wrong orientation. Thinning misguided branches
removes a problem, and sends a stimulus to the remaining, properly
oriented branches. Figure 1.19 shows how heading and thinning cuts are
used to train a young tree to a central leader system. Also shown in
this figure is the proper time for pruning: late winter. Sometimes
pruning is done in the summer to eliminate excess growth and improve
light penetration into the canopy. Pruning in the autumn should be
avoided since it can reduce cold hardiness.
Figure 1.19. Training of a single-stemmed, young tree to a central
leader in 2 years with heading and thinning cuts.
References on planting design,
training, and pruning:
Baugher, T.A., and
S. Singh (eds). 2003. Concise encyclopedia of temperate tree fruit.
Haworth Press, New York.
Childers, N.F.,
J.R. Morris, and G. S. Sibbett. 1995. Modern Fruit Science, 10th
edition. Norman F. Childers, Publ, Gainesville, FL.
Galletta, G.J. and
D.G. Himelrick (eds). 1990. Small fruit crop management. Prentice-Hall,
Eglewood Cliffs, NJ.
Gilman, E.F. 1997.
An illustrated guide to pruning. Delmar Publ., Albany, NY.
Jackson, D.I.
1986. Temperate and subtropical fruit production. Butterworths of New
Zealand, Wellington, NZ.
Ryugo, K. 1988.
Fruit culture. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Teskey, B.J.E. and
J.S. Shoemaker. 1978. Tree fruit production, 3rd edition. AVI Publ.,
Westport, Conn.
Westwood, M.N.
1993. Temperate zone pomology, 3rd edition. Timber Press, Portland, OR.
A
note about backyard fruit growing.
Some of the cultural practices detailed in this text may not be
appropriate to backyard fruit culture. If you live in an area that
happens to be one of the main production centers for a crop, then
you're fairly safe in adapting the commercial practices to your own
backyard. It stands to reason that I can offer only generalized advice,
which may or may not be sufficient for you to be successful. In most
areas of the world, particularly North America, information provided
through government extension services is available, generally free of
charge on the Internet, or from the local Extension Agent or Farm
Advisor. Below I've listed key Land Grant universities that publish
this type of information and the web addresses as of 2004.
Region
|
Land Grant Universities
|
Website
|
Northeast
|
Cornell
Penn State
|
http://www.hort.cornell.edu/
http://tfpg.cas.psu.edu/
http://ssfruit.cas.psu.edu/
|
Mid Atlantic
|
Virginia Tech
North Carolina State
Region-wide
|
http://www.ento.vt.edu/Fruitfiles/VAFS.html
http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/depts/hort/hil/hfruitnew.html
http://www.caf.wvu.edu/kearneysville/fruitloop.html
|
Southeast
|
Univ of Georgia
Univ of Florida
|
http://www.uga.edu/hort
http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/DEPARTMENT_HORTICULTURAL_SCIENCES
|
Midwest
|
Michigan State
|
http://www.msue.msu.edu/fruit/
|
Inter-mountain west
|
Colorado State
|
http://hla.agsci.colostate.edu/
|
Southwest
|
Texas A&M
|
http://aggie-horticulture.tamu.edu/extension/fruit.html
|
Pacific Northwest
|
Washington State
Oregon State
|
http://treefruit.yakima.wsu.edu/
http://oregonstate.edu/dept/hort/
|
California
|
Univ. of California - Davis
|
http://fruitsandnuts.ucdavis.edu/
|
To the Top
Pest
Problems
For each crop, the major
problems that occur in many regions or the
largest production region are highlighted. This section must be
generalized because pests and diseases tend to be highly regional. Once
again, refer to the sources listed above for specifics on pest
management. Here, I present a brief overview of major pests of fruit
crops and their management options.
Weeds
Although "weed" doesn't fit some
people's definition of pest, the
single greatest limitation to yield in agriculture is weeds, and more
herbicides are used in the USA than all insecticides and fungicides
combined. Fruit crops are intolerant of heavy weed infestations or turf
grass growing next to the trunk (Figure 1.20). Three basic control
strategies for weeds are herbicides, mulches, and cultivation.
Commercially, growers generally keep a weed-free strip beneath trees
using herbicides or mulch (Figure 1.21). Mulching is effective, but
more labor intensive and costly than herbicides. Organic growers
frequently use mulches since herbicides are not cleared for use in
organic orchards. Cultivation is used often in arid climates in
conjunction with flood irrigation, or with crops harvested from the
ground (nuts). Cultivation can damage roots and tree trunks, and
increase erosion. In developing countries, or on small organic farms
growers may weed plots with hand implements. In this text, nothing more
will be said about weeds of individual crops, and it can be assumed
that weeds are problems in the production of all fruit crops.

|

|
Figure 1.20. Three-year-old ‘Empire' apple
trees with different amounts
of weed competition. At left, tall fescue grass was allowed to grow up
to the trunk; at right, tall fescue was kept at least 4 ft away on all
sides (photos courtesy of Mike Parker, NC State Univ.).
Figure 1.21. Orchard floor management with
herbicide strips beneath trees and grass row middles in apple (above),
clean cultivation in grapes (center), and mulch strips in an organic
apple orchard (below).
Insects and Mites
There are literally hundreds of
thousands of species of insects – more
than any other life form on the planet. In some fruit crops, up to 300
insects have been documented to cause damage to one or more parts of
the plant. Fruits are particularly attractive to some insects since
they are sources of food and protection, and useful sites for raising
the next generation (Figure 1.22). Generally, only a few cause economic
injury to any given crop, and often one or two represent the bulk of
the outlay for insecticides or other forms of protection. The text
focuses on these key pests, as a complete discourse on all species
affecting the crop is prohibitively lengthy. Some of the most common
insect and mite problems of fruit crops are listed in Table 1.3.

Figure 1.22. Larvae of the oriental fruit
moth feeding on the seed of a developing peach fruit. Infestation this
early generally causes fruit drop.
Table 1.3. Major insect and mite pests affecting fruit crops.
Insect
|
Crops affected1
|
Damage
|
Codling moth
(Cydia pomonella)
|
Apple, pear, plum, walnut
|
Fruit feeding, fruit drop
|
Oriental fruit moth
(Grapholita molesta)
|
Peach, plum, apricot, almond,
apple
|
Shoot dieback, fruit feeding,
fruit drop
|
Plum curculio
(Conotrachelus nenupar)
|
Peach, plum, apple, cherry,
blueberry
|
Surface scarring, catfacing,
fruit feeding, fruit drop
|
Leafrollers (e.g., Platynoda,
Argyrotaenia spp)
|
Apple, pear, peach, plum, grape,
citrus, strawberry
|
Leaf & bud feeding, damage;
webbing on fruit; fruit damage and subsequent rot
|
Scales (e.g., Quadraspidiotus)
|
Most fruit crops
|
Fruit scarring, cosmetic damage;
leaf feeding; limb and twig dieback, tree decline; honeydew secretion
and sooty mold development
|
Stink bugs & Plant bugs
(e.g., Leptoglossus, Lygus)
|
Most fruit crops
|
Fruit catfacing, spotting
|
Aphids (e.g., Aphis)
|
Most fruit crops
|
Leaf and shoot feeding,
distortion; honeydew secretion and sooty mold development; virus
transmission
|
Leafminers (e.g., Lithocolletis)
|
Citrus, apple
|
Leaf feeding by tunneling
|
Mites (e.g. Tetranychus,
Panonychus)
|
Most fruit crops
|
Leaf feeding, stippling,
distortion; webbing at shoot tips
|
1Partial list of major crops affected

Mites are spider relatives, not true
insects, which injure plant
tissues by puncturing cells on the surface and ingesting the contents.
Feeding damage results in a
stippled appearance of leaves and other
organs attacked (Figure 1.23). If unchecked, leaves lose the ability to
photosynthesize efficiently, and often fall off prematurely. Fruit
feeding may cause undesirable blemishing or stippling of the peel,
causing a downgrade in fruit external quality.
Figure 1.23. A normal mandarin leaf (left)
and one damaged by mite feeding (right) showing the familiar stipple
symptoms.
Plant Diseases:
Fungi, Bacteria,
Mycoplasmas, and Viruses
Fungi cause most diseases of fruit
crops. The fungi are a highly
diverse and widespread group of organisms, ranging from simple water
molds and mildew to beneficial organisms like yeast and mushrooms.
Their life cycles are extremely complex, but all produce spores of some
type that float on wind currents, splash around on raindrops, or hitch
rides on insects. Once the spore reaches a suitable host, it germinates
and the fungus grows through or on the tissue, provided ample water is
available. That's the critical issue in many cases – the presence of
water – and the reason that crops grown in dry climates often have far
less fungal disease than those grown in humid climates. Fungal diseases
can affect any part of the plant, and those affecting fruit directly
are some of the worst problems facing fruit growers (Figure 1.24).
Common diseases of fruit crops are listed in Table 1.4.
|

|
Figure 1.24. The brown rot fungus on
ripe peaches (left). The tan dots are spore masses. Note the spread of
the fungus between two adjacent fruit. The bacterial disease fire
blight on a pear shoot (right). Dying shoots turn black and exhibit a
typical "shepherd's crook" shape.
Table 1.4 Major fungal and bacterial diseases
of fruit crops.
Disease
|
Crops Affected
|
Symptoms and Damage
|
Fungal diseases –
leaves and stems
|
Powdery mildew (Podosphaera,
Sphaerotheca, and Uncinula spp)
|
Apple, grape, strawberry,
cherry, peach, plum
|
Distorted, stunted growth at
shoot tips with white, powdery spore masses on both sides of leaves;
web-like russeting or discoloration of fruit
|
Leaf spots or scabs (e.g.,
Mycospharella, Venturia)
|
Apple, pear, peach, strawberry,
many others
|
Circular, angular or irregular
blemishes or lesions on leaves. Spots often coalesce to form blotches
if severe.
|
Fungal diseases –
fruit
|
Brown rot (Monilinia spp)
|
Peach, apricot, plum, cherries,
almond, quince
|
The blossom blight phase kills
flowers at bloom; the fruit rot phase occurs within days of harvest.
Brown, soft spots spread rapidly, producing powdery tan spores.
|
Gray mold or bunch rot (Botrytis
spp)
|
Grape, strawberry
|
Classic grey, velvety covering
over ripe fruit; fruit softens, shrinks as a result.
|
Anthracnose (Colletotrichum spp.)
|
Banana, mango, avocado,
papaya, pineapple
|
Small to large, brown or black,
sunken lesions on fruit surface near harvest; lesions may coalesce in
badly infected fruit. Lesions usually dry and firm.
|
Fungal diseases –
trunk, crown, and roots
|
Armillaria or oak root rot
(e.g., Armillaria)
|
Apple, grape, peach, plum,
cherry, apricot, walnut, citrus, many others
|
Wilting, decline, and/or dieback
of the aboveground portion of the tree; a conspicuous white mycelial
mat forms between the wood and bark of affected trees, and clusters of
mushrooms may grow at the base of the trunk
|
Stem canker (e.g., Leucostoma,
Phomopsis)
|
Apple, pear, peach, plum,
cherry, apricot, almond, many others
|
Sunken, discolored, or rough
areas in bark; often round or elliptical in shape. Size variable, may
grow in size from year to year. Limb weakening or dieback through
girdling. Callus tissue may form at margins of large cankers.
|
Vascular wilt (e.g.,
Verticillium, Fusarium)
|
Peach, plum, apricot, cherry,
black- and raspberries, almond, strawberry
|
Leaves wilt, become chlorotic or
turn brown, followed by shoot dieback. Often one limb or side of the
plant affected before other(s). Yellow, red, or brown discoloration of
vascular tissue.
|
Phytophthora root/crown rot
|
Apple, pear, peach, apricot,
cherry, plum, citrus, others
|
Poor shoot growth, chlorotic
leaves and generally lack of vigor. Shoot dieback and tree collapse may
occur after rainy periods.
|
Bacterial diseases
|
Bacterial canker (Pseudomonas
syringae)
|
Peach, plum, apricot, cherry,
almond, walnut, others
|
Irregular, sunken areas in bark;
variable in size. Often with amber gum exuding from canker in spring.
Tissue beneath cankers is discolored and often sour smelling. Twigs,
limbs, or entire trees dieback, but tree sprouts from rootstock since
roots are alive.
|
Crown gall (Agrobacterium
tumefaciens)
|
Over 200 species of woody plants
|
Galls or tumors from ¼"
to 6: in size form at the crown or on main roots. Tree may not exhibit
foliar symptoms if galls are small; large galls may cause stunting and
leaf chlorosis, particularly on young trees.
|
Fire blight (Erwinia amylovora)
|
Pear, apple, quince
|
Browning or blackening and
withering of flower clusters or current season's shoots. Shoots appear
burned, and curl at tips into a "shepherd's crook" shape. Entire limbs
and trees can be killed by girdling
|
Leaf scorch, scalds, declines
(Xylella fastidiosa)
|
Peach, plum, grape, citrus;
species in over 30 plant families
|
This is a bacteria-like organism
called a mycoplasma; it grows in the xylem and restricts water and
nutrient flow, often for years before the tree or vine succumbs.
|
Bacterial diseases of fruit crops are not as common or diverse as
fungal diseases, but more difficult to control. In fact, the only
solution for some crops is to produce them in areas where bacterial
growth and dissemination is disfavored. For example, pears were
cultivated commercially in New York, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and other
eastern states in the 1800's and early 1900s. The bacterial disease
Fire Blight (Figure 1.24) wreaked havoc in these rainy, humid climates,
and pear culture gradually moved to the arid Pacific Northwest where
the disease does not develop as well. As in humans, bacterial diseases
can be treated with antibiotics, but this is cost prohibitive for most
commercial fruit growers. Quite often, the only solutions are to grow
resistant cultivars, or to remove and destroy infected plant parts as
soon as the infection is noticed.
Mycoplasmas are somewhere between bacteria and viruses on the
evolutionary scale of life. Diseases such as Pierce's disease of grape,
plum leaf scald, and phony peach are examples of the blight that
mycoplasmas bring to the fruit world. Mycoplasmas colonize the
water-conducting tissues of woody plants, and after multiplying for
months or years, they eventually clog the xylem and kill or severely
debilitate the plant. Insects that feed on xylem sap, such as leaf
hoppers and spittle bugs carry them from plant to plant. It is not
feasible to control the disease through insecticide spraying, because
it takes only one feeding event from one insect to transmit the
disease. Injections of antibiotics can slow the disease, but resistant
cultivars, rouging, and quarantines are the only practical methods of
control.
Viral diseases are similar to mycoplasmas in many respects. They are
moved by insects in many cases. They may also move on pruning tools and
some even in pollen, so are a bit more mobile than the mycoplasmas.
Once a plant is infected, it remains so for the rest of its life. As in
human medicine, there is no cure for viral diseases. Viruses usually
cause striking symptoms like mosaic yellowing of leaves, unusual
spotting patterns, or twisting and contortion of leaves and shoots, so
it is easy to spot an infected plant and remove it from the site.
Plants can live many years after being infected with a virus, sometimes
without showing obvious symptoms, and thus be a source of infection for
other trees for long periods of time. Rouging infected plants is often
the only means of controlling viruses.
Nematodes
Nematodes are microscopic,
non-segmented round worms that feed on roots
of plants. Nematodes are one of the most diverse groups of organisms on
the planet, with hundreds of thousands of species named (and still
counting). Species in only 2 of 15 orders of nematodes actually
parasitize plants, but that leaves more than enough to go around.
Virtually every agricultural crop known to man plays host to a dozen or
so nematodes. The most common fruit pests tend to be in the root knot
(Meloidogyne), ring (Criconemella), dagger (Xiphinema), root lesion
(Pratylenchus), and cyst (Heterodera) groups. Despite their diversity,
nematodes cause similar injury symptoms because they simply feed on
roots, reducing the ability of the root system to support the top of
the plant. Stunting, wilting, chlorosis, and in severe cases, toppling
over are common symptoms. While they cannot be seen with the naked eye,
the result of their feeding is often easily detected in the form of
root galls, knots, lesions, or simply poor root development (Figure
1.25).

|

|
Figure 1.25. "Banana topple"
disease, caused by Radopholus nematode
feeding on roots (left). Root death leaves plants poorly anchored, and
they fall over easily in heavy rain or wind (right).
Soil fumigation prior to planting is often recommended in soils with
high nematode populations. Fumigants and other nematicides are highly
toxic chemicals that provide good control, but are dangerous to work
with and strictly regulated by federal, state and local government
agencies. Methyl bromide, the chief soil fumigant used in fruit crops,
has been gradually phased out of production due to its ability to
escape into the atmosphere and cause ozone depletion. Alternatively,
tolerant rootstocks can be used for certain crops; for example
‘Nemaguard' rootstock for peach, which resists root knot nematode
feeding (Meloidogyne incognita). Note that nematode resistant
rootstocks resist feeding by only a few species of nematodes at best,
and no rootstock resists feeding by all nematodes.
Basic approaches
to pest control
Pesticides are not the only way to
deal with pests. They are extremely
effective and commonplace today, but agriculture was practiced for
several thousand years before the development of synthetic pesticides.
I divide approaches to pest control into five basic strategies,
recognizing that elements of 2 or more strategies may be utilized by a
given fruit grower.
Let
nature take its course. Doing
nothing is easy, so letting nature take its course is quite popular
with backyard gardeners. In fact, there is solid scientific
justification for doing nothing, since every native pest has some
natural enemy, and sooner or later that enemy will bring the pest
population back into balance, at least from Mother Nature's viewpoint.
The real question is whether that natural balance occurs at a point
where a commercial grower can make a profit. A commercial grower with
the thinnest of profit margins can scarcely afford to throw out even
one tenth of their crop. This method is also used in integrated pest
management (IPM, see below) when pest pressures are not severe enough
to warrant action. The direct environmental impact of this method is
obviously none, but indirectly, if more land must be cleared for
cultivation to compensate for lower yields, the impact of doing nothing
can be severe.
Cultural
Control. This includes all
non-chemical or biological means to control pests. Generally, these are
not as rapidly effective as chemicals and done well in advance of pest
outbreaks. An example would be closely mowing the grass beneath orchard
trees to remove stink bugs living there, just waiting to jump on the
newly set fruit after bloom. Cultural controls help to relieve or
reduce pest pressures, and often reduce the number of chemical sprays
required, but alone they infrequently reduce pests to insignificant
levels. The environmental impact is generally minimal, but some
cultural controls can damage the environment; for example, tilling
weeds and leaving the soil exposed may accelerate erosion. Here are
some important cultural controls in brief:
- Sanitation – One
bad apple can indeed spoil the whole bunch, so locating and rouging out
the bad ones, when feasible, is a good idea. A flower, fruit, leaf or
twig affected by a pest is often the source for further infection
within the same tree or orchard. With sanitation, one is physically
removing the pest organism and/or its means of propagating itself,
which slows the rate of pest build up. One example is pruning out fire
blight affected shoots in pears and apples to remove the bacteria that
could otherwise affect another shoot within the tree. Disease organisms
often overwinter in trees they affected the previous summer, so dormant
pruning presents an opportunity to reduce the pest's potential numbers
in the upcoming season.
- Life cycle
disruption – If one can disrupt any point of a pest's life cycle, its
population will collapse. For insects, this has been exploited
commercially with the use of pheromone mating disruption. Pheromones
are chemicals that allow insects to communicate, and certain pheromones
allow male insects to find females during the mating period. Once the
specific mating pheromones were identified, researchers reasoned that
saturating an area with pheromone would prevent males from finding
females. Commercially, this is done for pests such as grape berry moth
and codling moth by attaching plastic ties to tree limbs that release
pheromone. This works great for large orchards, or in any case where
the mating takes place in the orchard. In small, irregularly shaped
plantings, there's a lot of border area, and adults can easily mate
outside the orchard, after which the female can fly in to lay eggs.
Nevertheless, this has reduced the need for chemical sprays for certain
pests substantially, and is a strategy with almost no non-target
effects.
- Traps, baits,
diversions – Similar to the foolery involved in life cycle disruption,
we can use pheromones or other attractants to lure insects to traps or
diversions and kill them, or at least steer them away from the crop.
The insect is often lured by visual or chemical cues to a sticky trap
where it lands and cannot escape. This has been very successful for
controlling flies that produce maggots in apple, blueberry, and cherry.
For apple maggot, decoys are made that look like nice red fruit for
laying eggs (Figure 1.26). The decoys are laced with insecticide,
killing all flies that approach. They are also made of cornstarch so
they break down naturally in the field. In some trials, pesticide
application has been reduced by 90% using this method.
- Resistant
cultivars – This is the ultimate in cultural pest control strategies,
simply planting cultivars that are genetically resistant to the pest.
Sounds easy, and has worked in the past for some key pests, but
resistant cultivars are slow to develop and sometimes unavailable.
Also, pest resistance is specific; years of breeding may go into
conferring tolerance to one species (or subspecies) of a pest, leaving
several others available to affect the crop. Last, the pest often
breaks down the resistance of the host if the two are left alone in the
evolutionary landscape for a period of time, which makes breeding an
ongoing effort.
Figure 1.26. Fruit decoys for control of
apple maggot. At left, USDA entomologist Michael McGuire examines
decoys in an apple tree. At right, Erica Bailey prepares a cornstarch
based apple decoy. The red color attracts the flies to the decoy for
egg laying, and the insecticide within kills the adult.
Biological
Control. This involves
introducing other organisms that prey on or parasitize the pest of the
fruit crop. Biological control is extremely effective for specific pest
problems, but has yet to achieve the widespread use of most other pest
control strategies. For example, introduction of the Vedalia beetle to
control cottony cushion scale in California citrus eliminated the need
to spray for that pest. Since other insects may attack citrus,
unfortunately, Vedalia beetles are killed while spraying to control
something other than cottony cushion scale. Another limitation is the
need for at least some pest population to be present to support the
biological control agent. This basal pest population may be above the
threshold for economic loss. Also, the bio-control agent may need other
sources of food besides the pest to live, and we may not have these
present or even know what they are in some cases.
Chemical
Control. Pesticides
are much more responsive than cultural or biological controls, allowing
a grower to react instantly to a crisis, and quickly reduce pest
populations. Unfortunately, many non-target organisms are affected by
chemical applications, and there is potential for human and
environmental damage from pesticide misuse. Chemicals have evolved over
the years to be less persistent in the environment and have fewer
non-target effects, and some of the worst chemicals (e.g., DDT and EDB)
were banned years ago. In some cases, availability of pesticides
prompted growers to reduce cultural controls in favor of spraying
chemicals every few weeks (days) to control pests without knowing
whether or not they were present. This spray-by-calendar strategy is
not common anymore due to the advent of integrated pest management.
Integrated
Pest Management (IPM). As
the name suggests, many methods of control are used in an integrated
fashion to reduce crop losses. Cultural and biological controls are
often used, and pesticides are applied only when other means fail to
keep pests below a certain threshold. This threshold, determined by
years of research, is the level of pest infestation that can be
tolerated before economic losses occur. IPM generally reduces the
effect of pesticides on the environment by reducing the number of spray
applications, not eliminating sprays entirely.
Scouting is used in IPM to
determine if thresholds have been reached.
For example, a scout might sample 50 leaves in an orchard block, and
count the number of mites on the underside of each leaf. If an average
of more than 2 mites per leaf were found, the grower would take action
and spray, since research shows that the 2 mites per leaf threshold is
the point where economic losses begin to occur. Pheromone traps are
often used in IPM to monitor pest populations (Figure 1.27). Unlike the
apple maggot traps described above, they are not designed to control
the insect population, but serve as indicators of pest presence and aid
the grower in spray timing.

Figure 1.27. Entomologist Dan Horton
places a pheromone trap in an apple tree to monitor insect populations
and advise growers on spray timing.
IPM demands greater technical
knowledge – growers must be able to
recognize all types of insects, fungal signs and symptoms, etc, and
quantify their extent quickly. Alternatively, consultants or scouts are
available for hire to do this work, or an extension agent may be
assigned the task in commercially important fruit-producing regions.
Organic farming has received great
attention over the last decade or
so, and is currently the fastest growing segment of agriculture in the
United States. Pest management in organic farming is really just a form
of IPM that does not use synthetic chemicals as a control option. One
common misconception is that "organic" means "not sprayed with
chemicals". A certified organic farmer can use chemicals for pest
control if they are naturally occurring or plant-derived. This does not
mean that such chemicals are not toxic to humans or wildlife. For
example, rotenone, a natural insecticide compound, is extremely toxic
to fish and can be harmful to pesticide applicators. In some cases,
such as apples in humid climates, organic farmers spray pesticides more
frequently and apply far more active ingredient per acre per year than
conventional farmers. Organic fruit growers can afford higher crop
losses because current prices are often double those paid for
conventional produce. The upsurge in organic farming has prompted all
fruit growers to rethink their approach to pest control and pesticide
use.
Food safety in
fruit crops. In the United
States, the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) has the
responsibility of enforcement of the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) standards in the nation's food supply. They routinely test food
destined for the consumer's kitchen for a variety of chemical and
biological hazards. There are also state agencies that do essentially
the same thing, adding another layer of safety assurance. Figure 1.28
shows an example of residue testing by the FDA in 2001. The domestic
data is derived from fruit samples collected from 41 states and Puerto
Rico. The 2001 data are typical for domestic fruit, showing about 1%
violative samples. A violative sample is one containing even a trace
amount of a pesticide not registered for that crop, or an amount of
legally registered pesticide above the crop tolerance. Crop tolerances
are set by the EPA at levels at least 100-fold below the level that
caused no observable effects in lab animals that ate the pesticide
every day of their lives. Imported fruit data is derived from fruit
samples from 99 countries with Mexico the primary source. Imported
fruit contained slightly more violative samples in 2001, but also had a
higher percentage of no detectable residues. Thus, 97-99% of the time,
fruit consumed in the United States has either no residue or residues
that fall well below EPA tolerance.

|

|
Figure 1.28. Pesticide residue test
results from 2001 by the Food and Drug Administration for domestic
fruit (above) and imported fruit (below).
References on pests and pest control:
Print Resources:
Alford, D.V. 1984.
A colour atlas of fruit pests. Wolfe Publ., London.
Avery, D.T. 1995.
Saving the planet with pesticides and plastic. Hudson Institute,
Indianapolis IN.
Croft, B.A. and
S.C. Hoyt. 1983. Integrated management of insect pests of pome and
stone fruits. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
Flint, M.L. 1998.
Pests of the garden and small farm: a grower's guide to using less
pesticide. Second edition. Univ. Calif. Div. Agric. & Nat. Res.
Pub. 3332. 276 pages.
Lind, K., G.
Lafer, K. Schloffer, G. Innerhofer, and H. Meister. 2003. Organic fruit
growing. CABI Publ., Wallingford, UK.
Ogawa, J.M. and H.
English. 1991. Diseases of temperate zone tree fruit and nut crops.
Univ. Calif. Div. Agric. & Nat. Res. Publ 3345. 461 pages.
Pena, J.E., J.L.
Sharp, and M. Wyoski. 2002. Tropical fruit pests and pollinators. CABI,
Wallingford, UK.
Ploetz, R.C. (Ed).
2003. Diseases of tropical fruit crops. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
The American
Phytopathological Society has published a series of Compendia on crop
diseases including apple and pear, blueberry and cranberry, citrus,
grape, raspberry and blackberry, stone fruit (peach, plum, apricot,
cherry), strawberry, and tropical fruit (Banana, coconut, mango,
pineapple, papaya, avocado). Full citations of compendia are given at
the end of the relevant crop chapters.
Web Resources:
On the issues of
pesticides and food safety, Extoxnet:
http://ace.orst.edu/info/extoxnet/
is a collaborative effort among
extension specialists from several universities. The information is
unbiased and science-based.
The USDA site on
organic food production: http://www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/ofp/
Photos of insects
and diseases of many crop plants: http://www.insectimages.org/
and
http://www.ipmimages.org/
The EPA's page on
pesticides: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/
The actual data
from the FDA's Total Diet Study, which monitors pesticide levels in
food in the USA: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~comm/tds-toc.html
To the Top
HARVEST,
POSTHARVEST HANDLING
Harvesting is usually the most labor
intensive, expensive component of
fruit growing, as it is usually accomplished by hand. Also, many
workers are needed to sort, grade, and pack the harvested fruit. In
this section, I present the basics of harvesting and handling common to
most species.
As the fruit reach maturity, one must decide when to harvest.
Harvesting too early results in poor size and quality, and harvesting
too late causes many of the fruit to soften, bruise, or rot before
reaching the consumer. Experience is key in this decision, but there
are a few tools that commercial growers can use to objectively
determine harvest date. Two of the most common tools are the
refractometer, which
measures the sugar content, and the firmness meter
(or penetrometer),
which quantifies the firmness of the flesh (Figure
1.29). As a fruit matures, sugars accumulate and the flesh softens.
From research, or past experience, growers know the ranges of sugar
content and firmness that correspond to a given cultivar and its
intended market. For example, apples intended to be stored for long
periods are picked more firm than apples intended to be marketed
immediately.

Figure 1.29. A refractometer for measuring
"soluble solids" or basically sugar content of fruit juice (left). The
penetrometer or firmness meter (right) measures the force required to
crush the flesh. Both are rapid field methods for monitoring crop
development and determining when to harvest.
Fruit color is also important in determining maturity, and strongly
influences consumer acceptance. However, color may develop in the fruit
skin well before or after the pulp reaches the optimal sugar content or
firmness, so skin color should not be relied upon exclusively. The
background color (or ground
color) of the fruit is often better
correlated with pulp characteristics than the red or highlight color.
Other methods have been developed for specific crops. In fruits that
store starch and gradually break this down into sugars, a starch test
can be performed to assess how much breakdown has occurred. In cherry,
the "fruit removal force", which is the tension required to pull the
fruit off, is measured with a pull gauge. Fruit used for processing
into juice or wine undergo more sophisticated measurements of sugar
content, acid content, pH, sugar/acid ratio, and other chemical
constituents before they are harvested.
As mentioned above, hand harvest is the norm, but in several crops
mechanical harvesters have been developed. These devices shake, slap,
or vibrate the plant to dislodge the fruit, and then collect the fruit
as it falls. Mechanical harvesters are most frequently used for nut
crops and fruits intended for processing, since blemishes or bruises
are unimportant or do not occur in these crops.
Fresh fruit are washed, graded, sorted, and packaged postharvest
(Figure 1.30). Most fruit are graded by size, and less often by color.
They are packed in various containers: mesh and plastic bags, cardboard
boxes, single-layer flats, and plastic "clamshells" for berries.
Perishable fruits are generally shipped immediately after harvest and
packing, but long-keeping fruits like apple and some pears may be
stored for months prior to packing and shipping.

Figure 1.30.
Scene at a banana packing
house where fruit are washed, culled, graded, and packed for distant
shipment.
Fruit storage temperature is dependent on species and cultivar. If
possible, fruit is stored around 32°F, as it will last the longest
at this temperature. Some fruits are susceptible to chilling injury,
which manifests itself as internal breakdown, surface pitting or
browning, or other disorders, after storage at low, nonfreezing
temperatures. The best example of this is the rapid browning that
occurs in bananas when placed in the refrigerator (Figure 1.31). Many
tropical fruits cannot tolerate temperatures below 45°F without
chilling injury. Controlled atmosphere
storage (called CA storage) is
used for some fruits (mostly apple), where the O2 level in the storage
room is lowered and the CO2 raised to inhibit fruit respiration and
subsequent breakdown. Some apples can be stored for 1 year using CA
storage.

Figure 1.31. A banana stored at room
temperature (above) and one stored at 40°F for 24 hours (below).
Chilling injury has occurred to the lower fruit, evident as peel
browning, which will get progressively worse with time.
References on harvest and postharvest
handling of fruit crops:
Mitra, S.K. (Ed).
1997. Postharvest physiology and storage of tropical and subtropical
fruits. CABI, Wallingford, UK.
Salunkhe, D.K. and
S.S. Kadam (eds). 1995. Handbook of fruit science and technology.
Marcel Dekker, New York.
Snowdon, A.L.
1990. A color atlas of post-harvest diseases and disorders of fruits
and vegetables. Vol. 1: general introduction and fruits. Wolfe Sci.
Publ., London.
Thompson, A.K.
2003. Fruit and vegetables: harvesting, handling, and storage.
Blackwell Pub., Oxford, UK.
CONTRIBUTION
TO
DIET, FOOD USES
Fruits are an essential component of a healthy diet, being high in
vitamins A and C, low in calories, and high in fiber. Nuts are packed
with protein and nutrients, but are generally high in fat and therefore
calories. In this section, I have listed the nutrient composition of
various fruits and nuts, and give the percentage of the recommended
daily allowance (%RDA) for each vitamin or nutrient. This is based on
the Food and Drug Administration guidelines for a 150 lb adult male,
assuming a 2700 calorie/day diet. Also listed are the major food uses,
and the utilization statistics (i.e., %fresh vs % processed), largely
based on USDA data.
References on dietary value,
consumption, and food uses:
Hansen, R.G., B.W.
Wyse, and A.N. Sorenson. 1979. Nutritional quality index of foods. AVI
Publ., Westport, Conn.
Lapedes, D.N.
(Ed). 1977. McGraw-Hill encyclopedia of food, agriculture, and
nutrition. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Morton, J.F. 1987.
Fruits of warm climates. Julia F. Morton, Publ., Miami, FL.
Schneider, E.
1986. Uncommon fruits and vegetables: a common sense guide. Harper
& Row, New York.
US Census Bureau.
2001. Statistical abstract of the United States.
http://www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-us.html
To the Top