Disseminating Science-based Home Food Preservation Information on the Internet
B. A. NUMMER1, E. L. Andress1,
J. A. Harrison1, M. A. Harrison2, and W. L. Kerr2.
(1) Dept. Foods and Nutrition Extension, University of Georgia, 208 Hoke Smith
Annex, Athens, GA 30602, (2) Dept. Food Science and Technology, University of
Georgia.
Paper 46B-5. Presented at the Institute of Food Technologists Annual Meeting Anaheim, CA, June 17, 2002.
Abstract
Home food preservation remains an important and popular cultural activity. The safety of these products and processes remains the number one concern. The National Center for Home Food Preservation (NCHFP) was created to help meet the needs of both
Extension agents and consumers for science-based information. As part of the NCHFP mission a web site was created to locate, review, and disseminate research-based home food preservation information. The web site,
www.homefoodpreservation.com, offers publications from U.S.D.A. guides and bulletins, the University of Georgia, literature reviews of current topics, links to other state Cooperative
Extension homepages, seasonal tips, multimedia demonstrations, FAQs, contact lists and a variety of other resources. Initial feedback from a sampling of Cooperative Extension agents has been favorable. Experienced home preservers have also
given favorable reviews, while inexperienced home food preservers commented that they are a bit overwhelmed. The initial comments and popularity of the site indicates that it is meeting its objectives of providing resources to Cooperative Extension professionals and increasing public awareness of
science-based safe home food preservation techniques.
Introduction
According to the latest
Nielsen Media Research survey there are now 92 million Americans over the age
of sixteen on the Internet (CommerceNet, 1999). This is almost half of the
population. This incredible growth in access has made the Internet an excellent
source for educational and reference materials. The Internet is fast becoming
an important tool for food safety specialists, allowing for rapid location of
specific information. One food safety resource, the National Food Safety Database, had over 10,000
requests per day, over 145,000 distinct users, and an international audience of
85 countries (Tamplin, 1998). The need for access to food safety information
will no doubt markedly increase in the coming years, with new food safety
regulations, media attention, and advances in Internet technologies.
Material and Methods
Web site. The web site was constructed by the Web
Instructional Development group, a part of the University of Georgia Center for
Continuing Education, Athens, GA and members of the National Center for Home
Food Preservation management team.
Design Analysis. Site design analysis was performed using criteria
developed by authors at Yale and Dartmouth Universities (Lynch and Horton,
1997).
Assessment. An assessment of objectives was obtained from a
small survey group of 37 educators and consumers and from direct feedback. Web
site users were encouraged to send direct feedback and a 15-question survey was
created (Exhibit 1) to solicit users feedback.
Results and Discussion
User-centered design. The NCHFP web site users are both consumers and
professionals. Consumers range from first-time home food preservers to highly
experienced food preservers. Professionals include Cooperative Extension
professionals, teachers, researchers, journalists, and publishers. The survey
group consisted of 17 Cooperative Extension agents, 17 consumers, and 3
others.
The front page. As an informational site, the front page (Figure 1)
establishes an overall visual design with the NCHFP logo. It identifies and
gives a brief explanation of the purpose of the site, and provides a site
overview by presenting links to its major sections. This page answers the
questions, Where am I? What is it like here? What do these people do? What kind
of stuff will I find? As a reference site visitors are able to tell at a
glance if the information they are seeking is inside. Ninety-two percent felt
the home page was “very useful” in its current form.
Figure 1. National Center for Home Food Preservation Front Page

Objectives. Clear and simple goals are key to successful web
sites (Table 1).
Table 1. NCHFP Web Site Goals
|
1. |
Disseminate “science-based” home food preservation information to professionals (educators) and consumers.
|
|
2.
|
Provide a “first stop” for science-based reference inquiries into home food preservation topics.
|
|
3.
|
Promote the Cooperative Extension system as a source of science-based home food preservation information.
|
|
4.
|
Help change consumer behaviors with respect to home food preservation safety.
|
|
5.
|
Interact with consumers and educators to review, research, and publish up-to-date science-based home food preservation information.
|
Authors. It is critical the audience understand who the
NCHFP is and the USDA message of using only “science-based” information. The
survey group was asked “On your first visit to the web site was it clear whom
the NCHFP was?” Eighty-one percent said “yes”, 16% said “yes, but I had to
look some” and 3% said “no, I found that information, but it was not completely
clear”. A second question asked, “On your first visit to the web site was it
clear what “science-based” guidelines and recommendations on Home Food
Preservation are?” Sixty-eight percent responded “yes”, 22% responded “yes,
but I had to look some”, 5% responded, “no, I found that information, but it
was not completely clear, and 5% responded they “did not find that
information”.
Navigation. An easy hierarchal structure amenable to both the
experienced web surfer and the novice was desired. Eighty-six percent of our
survey group responded that the web site was “well categorized and easy to
follow”; while 14% responded that it “could be figured out with some effort”.
Pages. Individual pages were created to be simple and
consistent. The survey group responded that the placement of buttons and
links, colors used, and overall page layouts were “well done and appealing”
(76%), “pretty good” (19%), and “nothing special” (3%). The survey group also
responded that the graphic appeal of our site was “professionally done and
contemporary in appeal” (73%), “pretty good” (24%), and “nothing special”
(3%).
Bandwidth. Sixty-five percent of the respondents had a
telephone modem or similar slow Internet connection (including all consumer
respondents), while 38% reported having a cable modem or similar faster Internet
connection. Keeping bandwidth usage to a minimum was critical in serving
these users. Some of the Adobe Acrobat™ PDF and Real Media™ files are large
for slower connections (Table 2). Some respondents indicated the site was too
slow (1 reply) or they had difficulty with large multimedia files (6 replies).
Providing alternate sources (e.g. CD-rom, print, downloadable files) for heavy
bandwidth files would help alleviate some of these problems.
Table 2. Files currently on the web site and bandwidth usage.
|
~ 300 html pages
|
averaging < 25 kbs per file
|
|
~ 60 Adobe Acrobat PDF
|
between 20 - 1350 kbs each
|
|
~ 80 gif or jpg images
|
averaging < 45 kbs per file
|
|
1 PowerPoint File PPT
|
130 kbs
|
|
7 Real Media (.ram) files
|
500 - 3,000 kbs each
|
Interactivity and Search. As both an informational and reference web site we
sought to provide quick access to relevant information. When information
cannot be located in a menu the search section can guide a user through
internal and external search resources to find information. There is also an
“Info request” form. Over 85% of the survey group indicated they found the
search features “very useful”. Written feedback from novice computer users
indicated they had difficulties understanding and using these search functions.
Thus, redesigning the “search” topic to make it a logical and simplistic tool
more amenable to both novice and expert computer users will be considered.
Multimedia. Some topics benefit by visual enhancement. We
created digital video, audio, and animation. This section was the most
troublesome of the web site content where 51% of our survey group felt the
multimedia section was less than “very useful”. Survey group participants had
problems with slow connections, downloading required software, and in getting
the multimedia software to run. To address these problems additional means of
delivering these files are being considered (e.g. CD-rom). The results may
have also been influenced by the minimal content of this section. More content
is scheduled to be added.
Change in knowledge and behaviors. Initial comments and
popularity of the site indicate that it is meeting its objectives of providing
resources to the Cooperative Extension System and increasing public awareness
of science-based safe home food preservation techniques. Overall 34 of 37
surveyed felt that the web site would be a positive influence to serve the home
food preservation needs of educators. One felt there would be “no influence”
due to the lack of usable materials and two consumers had “no opinion”. All 37
respondents felt the web site would be a positive influence on consumers.
Seventy-one percent of the survey group felt the “more information on the web
site the better”. Two respondents, both were novice food preservers, felt the
information “seemed like too much” or was “far too much”. This may suggest
the need for “beginner friendly” resources for an introduction to the web site
and its contents.
Suggestions. Written suggestions for materials to add included:
a site map, why preserve foods for beginners, what your Extension office can do
for you, what’s new page for the site, Latin foods, low sugar recipes, links to
master gardeners, metric conversions, links for international visitors, a food
pH guide, hazardous recipe listing, food safety of preserved gifts, new fruits
and vegetable varieties, as well as numerous requests for narrow information
topics (e.g. lemon curd, and pomegranate). Additional materials are currently
being created and reviewed for placement on the web site. A full-time
Webmaster has been hired for site management, further design and building of
the site, improvement of access in areas identified by this research, and
ongoing evaluation of the site.
References
Lynch, P. and S. Horton, 1997. Web
Style Guide. Yale University. Available at: http://info.med.yale.edu/caim/manual/
Accessed 17 May 2002.
Access Board. 2001. Web-based
Intranet and Internet Information and Applications. Washington
DC. Available at: http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/1194.22.htm. Accessed
1 Jun 2002.
CommerceNet. 1999. Industry Statistics. Available at: http://www.commerce.net/research/stats/wwwpop.html. Accessed 5 Jun 2002.
Tamplin, M.L. 1998. National Food Safety Database. Project No. 98-EFSQ-1-0330. The Food Safety and Quality National Initiative Abstracts. Washington, DC.: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available at: http://www.reeusda.gov/pas/programs/foodsafety/98abs.htm. Accessed 10 Jun 2002.
Exhibit 1. Survey for Center Web Site
The National Center for Home Food Preservation
1. Describe yourself
45% [17] Cooperative Extension Agent
[ ] State Cooperative Extension Specialist or Program Assistant
3% [ 1] Other University Faculty or Staff
[ ] Extension Volunteer / Master Food Preserver
45% [17] Consumer (Home Food Preserver)
5% [ 2] Other ____________________ e.g. Food Writer, Author, etc.
Total 37
2. Rate your experience level in Home Food Preservation
43% [16] Experienced
24% [ 9] Average Experience
24% [ 9] Some Experience
8% [ 3] Little experience
[ ] No experience
Total 37
3. What type of Internet connection are you using?
14% [ 5] Below 33.6 Kbps telephone modem or I don’t know numbers,
but it is a slow connection.
49% [18] 56Kbps telephone modem.
3% [ 1] Cable modem or I don’t know speeds, but it is a fast
connection.
35% [13] University or other high speed network connection
Total 37
4. On your first visit to the web site was it clear whom the National Center for Home Food Preservation was?
81% [30] Yes
16% [ 6] Yes, but I had to look some
3% [ 1] No, I found that information, but it was not completely clear
[ ] No, I had trouble finding that information
Total 37
5. On your first visit to the web site was it clear what “science-based” guidelines and recommendations on Home Food Preservation are?
68% [25] Yes
22% [ 8] Yes, but I had to look some
5% [ 2] No, I found that information, but it was not completely clear
5% [ 2] No, I had trouble finding that information
Total 37
6. In your opinion, the amount of information on our web site is:
3% [ 1] Far too much
3% [ 1] Seems like too much
23% [ 8] Appropriate
71% [25] The more the better
Total 35 No reply 2
7. In your opinion, the organization of our web site is:
86% [31] Categorized and easy to follow
14% [ 5] Could be figured out with some effort
[ ] Confusing and difficult to follow
Total 36 No reply 1
8. In your opinion, the graphic appeal of our home page is:
73% [27] Professionally done and contemporary in appeal
24% [ 9] Pretty good
3% [ 1] Nothing special
Total 37
9. In your opinion, the placement of buttons and links, colors used, and overall page layouts are:
76% [28] Well-done and appealing
19% [ 7] Pretty good
3% [ 1] Nothing special
Total 37
10. Please visit and rate the section topics of our web site for usefulness (please do not rate the topics on content - more content will be added to sections as we continue our project). Place a check mark in the box of your choice.
|
Information is:
|
Very Useful
|
Somewhat useful
|
Not Useful
|
| Home Page |
34 (92%) |
3 (8%) |
|
| Publications |
31 (84%) |
6 (16%) |
|
| Search Our Site |
30 (88%) |
4 (12%) |
|
| Search CES Sites |
30 (86%) |
5 (14%) |
|
| Seasonal Tips |
19 (56%) |
11 (33%) |
3 (9%) |
| Info Request |
22 (71%) |
7 (26%) |
2 (6%) |
| Multimedia |
17 (49%) |
13 (37%) |
5 (14%) |
| FAQs |
29 (85%) |
4 (12%) |
1 (3%) |
| Links |
32 (94%) |
2 (6%) |
|
| “How do I?” |
36 (100%) |
|
|
11. Please write section topic ideas that are not included in our web site that you feel would be useful (e.g. a site map).
Site Map, Why preserve foods for beginners, what your extension office can do for you, what’s new page for the site, latin foods, low sugar pages, links to master gardeners, metric conversions,
12. If you found useful information, was it available in a computer format that was accessible to you? (e.g. MS PowerPoint PPT, Adobe Acrobat PDF, Macromedia Flash, and Real Media).
81% [30] Yes
19% [ 7] Yes, but I had to or would need to download software to
make the information accessible.
[ ] No
Total 37
13. In your opinion, will this web site serve educators in the area of home food preservation?
92% [34] Positive influence
3% [ 1] No influence (responded not enough materials yet for educ.)
[ ] Negative influence
6% [ 2] No opinion
Total 37
14. In your opinion, will this web site serve consumers in the area of home food preservation?
100% [37] Positive influence
[ ] No influence
[ ] Negative influence
Total 37
15. What sources of frustration did you encounter on the web site? Please elaborate. You may also write general comments here.
Site was too slow (2 replies), trouble with Real Media/multimedia (6 replies), overwhelming information overload.
Reviewed by Elaine D’Sa, Ph.D. and Elizabeth Andress, Ph.D., National Center for Home Food Preservation.
This material is based upon work supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 00-51110-9762.
Document Use: Permission is granted to reproduce these materials in whole or in part for educational purposes only (not for profit beyond the cost of reproduction) provided the authors and the University of Georgia receive acknowledgment and this notice is included:
Reprinted with permission of the University of Georgia. Nummer, B.A., E. L. Andress, J. A. Harrison, M. A. Harrison, and W. L. Kerr. 2002. Disseminating science-based home food preservation information on the Internet. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension Service
References to commercials products, services, and information is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the University of Georgia, U.S. Department of Agriculture and supporting organizations is implied. This information is provided for the educational information and convenience of the reader.
The University of Georgia and Ft. Valley State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and counties of the state cooperating. The Cooperative Extension Service, the University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences offers educational programs, assistance and materials to all people without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex or disability. An Equal Opportunity Employer/Affirmative Action Organization Committed to a Diverse Work Force.
Contact:
top ^
Home ·
Publications ·
Search ·
Seasonal Tips ·
Info Request ·
Multimedia ·
FAQs ·
Contact ·
Links
|