| Search |
| |
|
|
| UGA News Bureau |
|
|
Top
News Stories
|
| In
the News
|
| Master
Calendar
|
| Advisories
|
| All
News Releases
|
Columns
Faculty/staff newspaper |
| News
from Schools & Colleges |
| Media Resources |
| Campaign and election experts
|
| Back to School Features
|
| Media
contacts
|
| Experts
directory
|
| e-News |
| Put
UGA's top stories on your site |
| Special Reports |
Latest budget information
Arch News - August 7, 2009
Response to Board of Regents request for UGA budget plan
Arch News - July 22, 2009
Budget update
University of Georgia President Michael F. Adams gave a budget update to the UGA community during the April 23 meeting of the University Council at the Georgia Center for Continuing Education Conference Center and Hotel. A video presentation and talking points are available for viewing.
Arch News - April 22, 2009
Upcoming budget presentation
Arch News - April 10, 2009
Status of the FY10 state budget
UGA president provides budget update
University of Georgia President Michael F. Adams gave members of University Council an update on UGA’s budget Thursday, Dec. 4 in wake of recent actions by the University System of Georgia Board of Regents to help meet an anticipated directive from state officials to increase the budget cut to 8 percent from the current 6 percent.
View December 4, 2008 Budget Update
Public forum on University Budget
On Wednesday, Sept. 17, President Michael F. Adams and other senior university officials delivered a presentation about the impact of current economic challenges and responded to questions from the audience. Links to archived video of the first budget forum on Sept. 5.
View September 1, 2008 forum online →
View September 5, 2008 forum online →
President's talking points [pdf] →
UGA Fiscal Update [ppt] →
|
|
Information on the April 25 off-campus shooting
|
| Information on the national outbreak of H1N1 virus (commonly known as swine flu) |
| President's
speeches |
| UGA's
Master Plan |
| The
UGA Century |
40th
Anniversary of
UGA's Desegregation |
| UGA
Responds: 9/11 |
| Featured
Research |
| Commencement
Addresses |
| ARCHE Reports |
University System of Georgia
news publications |
| Legislative
Updates |
| The
System Supplement |
| Value-Added USG Serves Georgia |
| A Worthy Investment |
| UGA Open Records |
| Request procedure, form and FAQs |
| The Office of the Attorney General of Georgia |
| The Georgia Secretary of State Open Records |
| The Georgia First Amendment Foundation |
| Contact UGA Open Records Manager |
|
Airbags associated with increased probability of death in automobile accidents, according to new UGA study
Writer: Philip Lee Williams, 706/542-8501, phil@franklin.uga.edu
Contact: Mary Meyer, 706/542-5232, mmeyer@stat.uga.edu
Jun 1, 2005, 10:58
Email this article
Printer friendly page
|
Athens, Ga. – The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that airbags installed in automobiles have saved some 10,000 lives as of January 2004. A just-released study by a statistician at the University of Georgia, however, casts doubt on that assertion.
In fact, said UGA statistics professor Mary C. Meyer, a new analysis of existing data indicates that, controlling for other factors, airbags are actually associated with slightly increased probability of death in accidents.
“NHTSA recorded 238 deaths due to airbags between 1990 and 2002, according to information about these deaths on their Web site,” said Meyer. “They all occurred at very low speeds, with injuries that could not have been caused by anything else. But is it reasonable to conclude that airbags cause death only at very low speeds? It seems more likely that they also cause deaths at high speeds, but these are attributed to the crash.
“For any given crash at high speed, we can’t know what would have happened if there had been no airbag; however, statistical models allow us to look at patterns in the data, and compare risks in populations, in a variety of situations.”
The study was published this week in the magazine Chance.
The new analysis directly contradicts earlier studies about the effectiveness of airbags, which have been required for drivers and front-seat passengers in all cars since the 1998 model year in the United States.
While the value of airbags seems dubious in the new study, the value of seatbelts is not. The analysis found that proper use of a seatbelt reduces the odds of death by 67 percent for any given speed category and airbag availability. Airbags, however, cause no statistical difference in car-crash deaths, except for unseatbelted occupants at low speeds, where the odds of death are estimated to be more than four times higher with an airbag than without.
It has been known for some time that airbags pose special risks to children and small women. Auto manuals routinely say young children, especially those in car seats, should not be put in front seats where they might be injured or killed by an inflating airbag.
The reason earlier studies have found that airbags save lives is that they used only a special subset of the available data, said Meyer. The Fatality Analysis and Reporting System (FARS) is a high-quality compilation of information about every highway accident for which a death occurred. The Crashworthiness Data System (CDS) is another high-quality dataset, containing random samples of all accidents. The previous studies used FARS, and Meyer’s study used CDS.
“When we look at the random sample of all accidents, we find that airbags are associated with increased risk of death,” she said, “and this increase is due to more deaths with airbags in low-speed crashes and no seatbelts. However, if we limit the dataset to include only collisions in which a fatality occurred, we get a significantly reduced risk of death due to airbags.”
By way of analogy, the Meyer explained it this way: “If you look at people who have some types of cancer, you will see that those who get radiation treatment have a better chance of surviving than those who don’t. However, radiation is inherently dangerous and could actually cause cancer. If you give everyone radiation treatments, whether they have cancer or not, you will probably find an increased risk of death in the general population.
“Making everyone have airbags and then verifying the effectiveness using only fatal crashes in FARS is like making everyone get radiation and then estimating the lives saved by looking only at people who have cancer. Overall, there will be more deaths if everyone is given radiation, but in the cancer subset, radiation will be effective.”
The new study directly contradicts assertions about airbag safety on the NHTSA Web site, said Meyer. The correct analysis is important to obtain now, because in only a few years, there will be virtually no cars on the road without airbags.
“We are confident that our analyses better reflect the actual effectiveness of airbags in the general population [than earlier studies],” said Meyer. “The evidence shows that airbags do more harm than good.”
##
Note to editors: The study appears in this week’s issue of Chance magazine, volume 18(2), pp. 3-16. Meyer can send a PDF file of the article on request to media.
Top of Page
|
|
