|
II.
Significant Structural and Functional Differences
|
| |
|
| |
Post-thermal
Pen Branch is dominated by macrophytes that trap and retain FPOM
resulting in a community dominated by collecting invertebrates
and those that shred or pierce plant tissue.
|
|
| |
Reference
systems lack macrophytes but have abundant debris dams that retain
organics. This results in a macroinvertebrate community that scrape
organic surfaces (biofilm) and shred trapped organics. |
| |
|
| |
Differences
in instream habitat structure are reflected in the relative abundances
of functional feeding groups. Collector gatherers were numerically
dominant and have been removed for comparisons. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CONCLUSIONS
|
| |
|
| • |
The post-thermal recovery of the macroinvertebrate community in
Pen Branch has been substantial and similar to other post-thermal
streams on site.
|
| • |
However, alterations in instream structural components and physical
changes in Pen Branch drive functional differences in the macroinvertebrate
community. This indicates a post-thermal shift in energy source.
|
| • |
Traditional biotic indices may not detect these functional differences.
However, investigation of functional feeding groups across streams
illustrates the long-term effects of thermally induced geomorphic
change on the current biotic community structure and function.
|
| |
|