Michelle
M. Gooch1, Aubrey M. Heupel1,2, Steven J. Price1,3
and Michael E. Dorcas1
1 Department of Biology, Davidson College, Davidson, North
Carolina 28035-7118, U.S.A.
2 Present address: Dept. Nat. Resource Ecology and Management,
Iowa State University, Ames,
Iowa 50011, U.S.A.
3
Corresponding author; e-mail: sjprice@davidson.edu
Abstract
Recent declines in amphibian populations have created an urgent need
for large-scale, long-term monitoring efforts and many anuran monitoring
programs have been established that utilize calling surveys. Calling
surveys can be effective monitoring tools; however, differences among
survey protocols may bias survey results. Failure to take into account
detection probabilities when monitoring anurans can lead to inaccurate
inferences about site occupancy, since non-detections in survey data
do not necessarily mean that a species is absent unless the probability
of detection is 1. We used a likelihood-based method, in the form of
the computer program PRESENCE, to estimate detection probabilities and
site occupancy rates for summer-breeding anurans in the Western Piedmont
of North Carolina. Using detection data from calling surveys, we evaluated
how detectability and site occupancy for five anuran species were influenced
by 1) time spent listening at each site, 2) number of surveys per site,
and 3) sample- and site-specific covariates. We found considerable variation
among species with regards to detection probability and site occupancy
across survey duration and sampling occasion. Although 13% of all species
detection occurred after 3 min, longer surveys did not significantly
increase detectability of individual species. We found that detectability
varied more with sampling occasion than with survey duration for each
species. Covariates had differing effects on occupancy and detectability
among individual species. Multiple surveys per site within a season
are necessary to eliminate biased detection probabilities, but we found
that 3- or 5-min surveys were adequate for detecting all species breeding
at the time of the survey.
Key
words: Anuran calling survey; frog; monitoring program; North
Carolina; PRESENCE.