|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||
| SREL Reprint #3068 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Empirical
Tests of Biased Body Size Distributions in Aquatic Snake Captures 1Savannah
River Ecology Laboratory, The University of Georgia, Drawer E, Aiken,
SC 29802 Abstract:
Ecologists often rely on a suite of demographic parameterssuch as
age structure, body size distributions, population density, and sex ratiosto
understand life history patterns, population dynamics, and community structure
of snakes. Unfortunately, in many cases little consideration is given
to how sampling techniques may influence the outcome of demographic studies.
Herein, we use a combination of field capture techniques, an extensive
database of field-captured snakes, and laboratory and field experiments
to evaluate how capture methods may influence demographic assessments
of several North American semi-aquatic snake species, including Agkistrodon
piscivorus, Farancia abacura, Nerodia fasciata, N.
floridana, N. rhombifer, N. taxispilota, Regina rigida,
Seminatrix pygaea, and Thamnophis sauritus. We found that
commercially available aquatic funnel traps (i.e., minnow traps) generally
yielded biased assessments of population demography, but that the nature
and magnitude of these biases varied predictably by species and trap type.
Experimental manipulations of funnel opening diameter in aquatic funnel
traps demonstrated that such modifications allowed for capture of larger
snakes but that the size of funnel opening necessary to capture the largest
individuals varied between species. Additionally, we found differences
between snake species in their ability to escape from different types
of traps at birth, suggesting that escape of neonates through trap mesh
can lead to the lack of small snakes often observed in field samples.
Overall, our results demonstrate that capture methods may bias assessments
of snake population demography, but that careful design of sampling methodology,
with consideration of potential biases, can yield meaningful data on snake
biology. Willson,
J. D., C. T. Winne, and M. B. Keck. 2008. Empirical Tests of Biased Body
Size Distributions in Aquatic Snake Captures. Copeia 2008(2): 401-408.
|
||||||||||||||||||