 
the
problem....
 |
| The D-Area ash basins drain into
Beaver Dam Creek and ultimately, the Savannah River. |
Coal combustion accounts for 90% of fossil fuel-related
wastes produced in the U.S. and coal combustion products
constitute a major category of solid waste on the Savannah
River Site. In D-Area, coal fly ash is discharged into open
settling basins that are located approximately one quarter
mile from the Savannah River. Effluent from these basins
enters Beaver Dam Creek, which provides an aquatic corridor
to the river. Coal fly ash contains trace elements, including
arsenic, chromium, cadmium, and selenium. These contaminants
are found at low levels in the water, at moderate to high
levels in the sediments, and at high levels in the aquatic
and semiaquatic biota of the settling basins and their downstream
discharge channels. Body burdens of contaminants in some
organisms in these areas are orders of magnitude greater than EPA
limits for humans. Among organisms that have been documented
to be contaminated by trace elements are alligators, softshell
and slider turtles, water snakes, largemouth bass, several
species of panfish, bullfrogs, toads, crayfish, cotton rats,
raccoons, and freshwater clams. Considerable potential exists
for pollutants to move from the D-Area settling basins into
nearby terrestrial areas as a result of semiaquatic and
terrestrial organisms feeding on prey items that are rich
in trace elements.
SREL
research....
SREL is conducting an integrated multidisciplinary research
program aimed at identifying the extent of contamination
at the D-Area ash basins and at providing less expensive
remediation alternatives to address the environmental contamination
resulting from the use of coal-fired power plants on the
SRS. Because most organisms respond behaviorally, physiologically,
and reproductively to contaminants at levels much lower
than those that would cause death, one aspect of SRELs
Ecotoxicology Program investigates impacts of ash basin
contaminants on organisms that occupy these basins. Comparisons
of animals from the ash basins to those from clean areas
have documented that:
- more than 85% of bullfrog tadpoles raised in the ash
basins had oral deformities that may have significantly
impacted their ability to feed,
- metabolic rates in bullfrog tadpoles from the ash basins
were 40-70% greater than tadpoles from control areas,
indicating that ash basin tadpoles must use much more
of their energy just to survive than do tadpoles from
reference areas,
- adult male toads from the ash basins exhibited increased
levels of circulating adrenal and sex hormones, which
may be indicative of animals subjected to prolonged exposure
to endocrine disrupting contaminants,
- adult toads from the ash basins contained significantly
higher levels of arsenic, selenium, and vanadium than
did toads from reference areas,
- chemical mapping studies have documented increased selenium
concentrations in the deformed mouth parts of tadpoles
from the ash basins, possibly as a result of selenium
being incorporated into structural proteins that normally
would contain sulfur,
- cotton rats from the ash basins had higher tissue concentrations
of arsenic, nickel, and lead than did animals from a reference
site,
- cotton rats from the ash basins exhibited a significantly
higher proportion of double-stranded DNA, possibly due
to DNA/DNA and DNA/protein crosslinking caused by arsenic
and nickel in the ash basins.
At D-Area, where coal is stored in large piles that are
exposed to the environment, minute amounts of sulfide minerals
contained in this coal weather and dissolve in water to
form an acidic metal-rich solution called acid-sulfate water.
This water percolates directly into the subsurface or is
directed as surface runoff to the D-Area Coal Pile Runoff
Basin (CPRB), where additional seepage occurs. Because of
the intense acid-sulfate contamination that occurs at the
CPRB, this area currently is designated a RCRA/CERCLA site.
 |
| Effluent from the D-Area power plant. |
SREL researchers are determining the factors that govern
the changing chemistry of basin and subsurface waters at
the CPRB and their relations to the contaminated aquifer
at D-Area. These studies use the distinct stable iso-tope
signatures of CPRB waters to trace and apportion water masses
at the site. With this knowledge, the chemical kinetics
of natural reactions can be defined to determine whether
D-Area CPRB sediments have the capacity to sequester contam-inants
in benign forms as they are mobilized in groundwaters at
the site.
In addition, SREL researchers are developing methods to
passively remediate CPRB surface waters by augmenting natural
attenuation reactions, such as sulfate reduction, that occur
at or near the sediment-water interface. Constructed wetlands
are being evaluated to determine their potential as a low
cost, effective method for improving the quality of contaminated
surface waters in D-area. Various components of natural
wetlands are being manipulated in a large field-scale experiment
to determine the primary factors that control the form and
availability of contaminants to wetland biota. Differing
substrates, plants, and microbial communities are being
tested to determine the appropriate combination that provides
the most effective remedial design for improving the quality
of CPRB waters.
 |
| Pilot project using constructed effluent
remediation. |
Using another approach, SRELs Waste Minimization
Program seeks to find safe and innovative uses for coal
combustion residues to alleviate potential environmental
impacts that result from long-term accumulation of coal
fly ash. Efforts include using coal fly ash to increase
the water retention capacity of soils and the harvestability
of sustainable biota such as turf grass species
and non-food agricultural crops. This technique currently
is being tested at the Columbia, SC Airport with funding
from the Electric Power Research Institute and South Carolina
Electric and Gas.
All of these efforts will result in the design of appropriate,
cost-effective remediation strategies that reduce contamination
to levels acceptable for human and ecological health and
allow evaluation of existing and future technologies that
are broadly applicable to the SRS and industrial sites across
the U.S.
D-Area Ash Basin 
(back to Research Snapshots)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|