BEAVERS
COULD BE ONE OF THE JOYS OF SPRING
by Whit Gibbons
April 21, 2003
We recently caught a full-grown beaver in a mammal trap we had set on
land for research involving raccoons. We let the big rodent go where
we found him. But sometimes encounters with these industrious creatures
are not so easily solved. In an environmentally conscious society like
ours, we will always face perplexing wildlife problems and environmental
dilemmas. Beavers offer a good example of the complexity of such issues.
Beavers have some positive traits. They are cute, especially a chubby
baby beaver dragging a little paddlelike tail behind him. Tame ones,
babies or adults, can safely be allowed to eat out of your hand. A family
of beavers in a lake can delight people who enjoy observing animal behavior.
If they do not feel threatened, beavers will busily go about building
their lodge, swimming about as a cooperative family unit. A person can
easily be charmed by their diligent work and friendly temperament. People
often view their hard-working nature as a positive trait that would
be desirable to acquire. A contented beaver family can be heard making
mewing sounds to one another. Anyone living along a lake with beavers
can have a rewarding wildlife experience and a lesson in social behavior.
The experiences, however, can unfold into predicaments. Sometimes the
costs of having your own beaver family can outweigh the benefits. The
predicament is how to keep beavers for outdoor show-and-tell yet have
them behave.
Residents around one local lake told me with pride of their small beaver
colony. Then the beavers cut down and carried away six boxwood shrubs
planted the previous afternoon. The next night, as if to underscore
the situation to their previously admiring audience, the beavers expertly
felled a flowering pink dogwood tree. Landowners with a nearby family
of beavers might understandably be concerned about the welfare of their
trees and shrubs. The largest tree known to have been cut down by beavers
was a cottonwood that was almost six feet in diameter.
In another situation beavers decided that the water level of a homeowner's
lake was too low to suit them. They proceeded to dam up the overflow
point, flooding the person's yard. The lake owners removed the beaver
dam, a decidedly temporary solution. Beavers, which do not care for
running water, will repair a broken dam within hours. In addition, the
beavers burrowed under the road and weakened the foundation of the house.
Another beavers-versus-humans confrontation involved a new boathouse,
inside which beavers soon built a lodge. The boathouse beavers were
at first considered cute; their appeal evaporated when they used the
boathouse pilings to increase the size of their lodge. Do you get rid
of the beavers or forfeit your personal property?
The problem was compounded in each instance because the people had grown
fond of the beavers and did not want to hurt them. A standard way to
remove beavers, with a steel snap trap that kills the animal, does not
qualify as "not hurting." So the human victims sought ways
to live trap the beavers unharmed. But what do you do with a live, captured
beaver?
Regional zoos have a limited demand for beavers, so this option is soon
exhausted. Releasing them in another lake or stream in the vicinity
is not fair to whoever lives there. Besides, beavers will return to
their former home if the distance is not too great. Beavers put the
issue of nuisance wildlife on a personal scale, and no simple answer
exists about what to do. Two contrasting alternatives are apparent:
kill the beavers or accept the destruction of property. In some situations
protective measures such as fences or retainer walls may work.
In each of the three cases above, the people facing a beaver problem
were concerned about the welfare of the offending animals. But each
homeowner solved the problem in a different way--one used steel traps;
one protected the shrubbery with a chain-link fence; and one allowed
the boathouse to be transformed into a beaver lodge. Beavers offer a
compelling example of the complexity of environmental conundrums and
the range of answers available depending on your environmental conscience.
How would you have solved each problem?
If you have an environmental question or comment, email 